15th Field Artillery Regiment crest

15th Field Artillery Regiment
1917 - 2008

The 15th Field Artillery motto - ALLONS - Let's Go!

WW1   WW2   Korea   Vietnam
  Panama   Bosnia   Iraq  Afghanistan

'Fighting 15th'

15th FDC
Home    Links
Site map
Search site
Terms of use

What's new
Contact us


We support

our troops

15th HQ

15th FAR


15th PX

World War 1
15th FAR



Scroll of Honor

15th FAR

World War 2
15th FAR



Scroll of Honor

15th FAR

Korean War
15th FAR




Scroll of Honor

Time Line
1LT Hartell

15th FAR

6/15 Vietnam
6/15 HQ

[2] [3]
[4] [5]
2LT Durham

Scroll of Honor

7/15 Vietnam
7/15 HQ



Big Guns

Fire Mission
Map Room
-The Guns
-More Photos
USNS Walker
Scroll of Honor

Vietnam War
15th FAR
Artillery Safety
Artillery Stories

Artillery Units

-XXIV Corps
-23d Group
-41st Group
-52d Group
-54th Group
-97th Group
-108th Group

Dave Rabbit

Draft Lottery

Firebases + LZ's


Listen Up
Nam Stories
Short Timer
State Wall


Time Line
Veterans Voices

15th Battalions
All Battalions
Ft Wainwright

15th Today
1/15 HQ

2/15 HQ
-Iraq War
Regimental Day

15th Medal
 of Honor

1LT Hartell
2LT Durham


1LT Kalsu

Vet Info 
Agent Orange [2]
Artillery Ears


Drug / Alcohol
Getting Medals
Gulf War Illness
Hepatitis C
Locating Vets




"...to care for him who shall
  have borne the battle"

Abraham Lincoln


C-123 Provider similar to the ones used to spray defoliants in Vietnam
C-123 "Provider" similar to the ones
used in Operation Ranch Hand
Photo: 15th webmaster

"Between 1962 and 1971, US military forces sprayed 
millions of gallons of herbicides 
over South Vietnam. 

Agent Orange accounted for much of the total sprayed."

NAS Press Release - July 28, 1993  [REPORT]


Korea DMZ Vets and Agent Orange  [see Announcements page]


Agent Orange Statistics - Statistical Summary 

the Rainbow

Herbicides were used by the U.S. during the Vietnam War to defoliate the hiding places of the Viet Cong (VC) guerillas and North Vietnamese Army (NVA) regulars.

The most infamous herbicide used was called Agent Orange. The steel drums in which the herbicide was transported were color-coded with an orange stripe.  Other colors such as Blue, White, Purple and Pink, were used to designate different herbicide formulations.

The largest volume of herbicide was applied from the air by C-123 "Provider" twin-engine aircraft.  This air spray program was code named Operation Ranch Hand. 

Herbicides were also used around the perimeters of fire bases to keep the concertina wire clear of vegetation, providing an open view for sentries on guard duty.  Herbicides were also sprayed along river banks to reduce the number of US casualties in the Brown Water Navy. 

Below is a map of the provinces of the Central Highlands showing the total volume sprayed of the three major herbicides used in the war; Agents Orange, Blue and White.


NOTE: This map features only the provinces near the 7/15th Field Artillery's area of operations in the II CORPS region of Vietnam.  Herbicides were also used in other provinces of Vietnam.


Figures indicate the number of gallons of herbicide applied during the Vietnam war.

Agent Orange

Agent Blue

Agent White

Date indicates the last time herbicides were used in that province.

Herbicide map

Also see: Operation Ranch Hand statistics page








Agent Orange 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T

1/65 - 4/70

Agent Orange II
"Super Orange"
2,4-D and 2,4,5-T 1968 and 1969
Agent Purple 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T 1/62 - 1964
Agent Pink 2,4,5-T 1962 - 1964
Agent Green 2,4,5-T 1962 - 1964
Agent White Picloram and 2,4-D


Agent Blue Cacodylic acid (arsenic)


Dinoxol 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T 1962 - 1964
Trinoxol 2,4,5-T 1962 - 1964
Diquat Diquat 1962 - 1964
Bromacil Bromacil 1962 - 1964
Tandex Tandex 1962 - 1964
Monuron Monuron 1962 - 1964
Diuron Diuron 1962 - 1964
Dalapon Dalapon 1962 - 1964


C123 PROVIDERS spraying herbicides iover the Republic of Vietnam
Transports fly in close formation as they
spray defoliation chemicals on the jungle
to deprive the enemy of hiding places


Following the war, veterans began to experience health problems that they attributed to herbicide exposure.   Finally, almost 20 years after the war ended, Congress asked the Institute of Medicine (IOM) National Academy of Sciences (NAS) to perform an in-depth study.  The length of time that had elapsed since the end of the war certainly didn't help the committee.

On July 28, 1993 the following Press Release was issued by the Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences:


July 28, 1993

WASHINGTON - Evidence exists linking three cancers and two other health problems with chemicals used in herbicides in the Vietnam War, a committee of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) has concluded.  Those diseases are soft tissue sarcoma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and Hodgkin's disease, as well as skin diseases chloracne and porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT).  The committee also concluded that new studies piecing together different types of information could help determine how much the risk of disease is increased in veterans who were exposed to such herbicides as Agent Orange.

The committee's report specifically focuses on Agent Orange and other herbicides used in Vietnam, some of which contained dioxin, and unintended byproduct of the manufacturing process.
"Over the years, extreme views have evolved on the issue," said Harold Fallon, IOM committee chair and dean of the School of Medicine at the University of Alabama, Birmingham.  "On one extreme is the view that Agent Orange has not led to health problems.  Our committee has determined through an extensive review of the scientific literature that indeed, there does appear to be a link between exposure to herbicides and certain diseases."

Most of the evidence the committee reviewed about adverse health effects came from studies of people who were exposed as a result of their jobs or from industrial accidents.  These types of exposures often were at high levels and for long periods of time.  Getting a clear picture of the health risks for Vietnam veterans is not so straightforward, the committee said, because the levels of exposure were extremely wide ranging.  Indeed, while most veterans probably had lower exposure levels, some may have experienced levels as high as that of occupational or agricultural exposures.  What is uncertain is how many veterans may have been exposed to those higher levels and who those individuals are.
"We simply do not know the degree of risk for Vietnam veterans," said committee vice chair David Tollerud, director of occupational and environmental medicine, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health.  "We do feel, however, that enough information exists to allow studies to be done that would lead to a better understanding of the risk that veterans face for contracting diseases related to herbicide exposure in Vietnam."


The committee examined more than 230 epidemiological studies in detail on a range of health problems and their possible association with herbicides. It found sufficient evidence of a statistical association between exposure to herbicides or dioxin and soft tissue sarcoma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and Hodgkin's disease. The committee also found sufficient evidence of an association between herbicides or dioxin and chloracne and PCT. Chloracne is a specific acne-like skin disorder; PCT is a liver disorder characterized by thinning and blistering of the skin.

The category of sufficient evidence represented the strongest link the committee made between adverse health effects and exposure to herbicides, including Agent Orange or dioxin.

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs currently compensates Vietnam veterans for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, soft tissue sarcoma, and chloracne.

The link between herbicides or dioxin and other adverse health effects the committee studied fell into three remaining categories:

> Limited or Suggestive Evidence. The committee found limited or suggestive evidence of an association between exposure to herbicides of the kind used in Vietnam and three other cancers: respiratory cancers, prostate cancer, and multiple myeloma.

> Inadequate Evidence. The scientific data for most cancers and other diseases, such as adverse neurological and reproductive effects, were inadequate or insufficient to determine whether an association exists, the report says (see attached list).

> No Association. For a small group of cancers, the committee found that a sufficient number and variety of well-designed studies exist to conclude that there is limited or suggestive evidence of no association between these cancers and the herbicides or dioxin. This group includes skin cancer, gastrointestinal tumors (colon, rectal, stomach, and pancreatic), bladder cancer, and brain tumors.


In reviewing the literature, the committee found that exposure assessment was the weakest element in most epidemiological studies of veterans. While some studies show a link between adverse health effects and herbicides or dioxin, there are few data indicating which individuals may have received high exposures during service in Vietnam.

The evidence about exposure during the war suggests that Vietnam veterans as a group had substantially lower exposure to herbicides and dioxins than the subjects in many occupational studies, the committee said. Veterans who were participants in Operation Ranch Hand -- the extensive spraying of some 19 million gallons of herbicide over 3.6 million acres of South Vietnam from airplanes -- are an exception to this pattern, however, because of their direct involvement in the spraying missions.

But the committee also said that, among the approximately 3 million Vietnam veterans, there may be some former ground troops not directly involved in the spraying who were exposed to herbicides at levels associated with adverse health effects.

The committee emphasized that it may be possible to develop better exposure measures for Vietnam veterans by relying on "less formal" sources of historical information than have been used in the past. Previous studies have relied primarily on the carefully recorded information on aerial spraying in Operation Ranch Hand and on blood tests for dioxin, but these measures may not reflect the full range of exposures of Vietnam veterans to herbicides.

The committee urged that a non-government organization be commissioned to develop and test new methods of evaluating herbicide exposure in Vietnam veterans. These new methods would draw on historical reconstructions and include information on the spraying that occurred around base camps and other areas which could have led to higher human exposures, the committee said. Important information could be gained from historical records of ground and perimeter spraying, herbicide shipments to various military bases, and knowledge of the type of terrain and foliage typical of the locations sprayed and the military mission of the troops located there. These new methods of measuring exposure should be evaluated by an independent, non-government scientific panel.

If they prove to be valid, a new series of epidemiological studies of veterans should be undertaken to assess the degree to which veterans may be at risk of cancer and other disease as a result of exposure, the committee said.

It also urged continued follow-up of the Ranch Hand veterans and its comparison group, and recommended that members of the Army Chemical Corps also be studied for adverse health effects from exposure. Studies should be done by an independent agency, noting that such an independent body could do much to 'satisfy the public's concern about impartiality and scientific credibility."

In addition, the committee recommended that -- for the purpose of facilitating the collection of data for new studies -- the U.S. Department of Defense identify in its computerized index of military service records which veterans served in Vietnam. Currently, this index does not indicate whether an individual served in the Vietnam War. "Lack of an indicator of Vietnam service complicates every epidemiologic study of veterans . . . and leads to methodologic inconsistencies."



Between 1962 and 1971, U.S. military forces sprayed millions of gallons of herbicides over South Vietnam. Agent Orange accounted for much of the total sprayed.

After a scientific report in 1969 concluded that one of the primary chemicals used in Agent Orange could cause birth defects in laboratory animals, use of the herbicide was suspended. All U.S.-authorized herbicide use in Vietnam was halted in 1971. As the decade wore on, concern about possible long-term health consequences of Agent Orange and other herbicides heightened, fueled in part by reports from Vietnam veterans that they had developed cancer or fathered handicapped children. Some veterans attributed these health problems to wartime exposure to herbicides.

Since then, thousands of scientific studies have been conducted. Faced with lingering uncertainty, Congress asked the National Academy of Sciences' Institute of Medicine to conduct a comprehensive review of available scientific information regarding the health effects of exposure to Agent Orange and other herbicides used in Vietnam. The report is the product of the IOM committee's work, begun in 1992.

The study was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

The Institute of Medicine is a private, non-profit organization that provides health policy advice under a congressional charter granted to the National Academy of Sciences.


TABLE 1-1 Summary of Findings in Occupational, Environmental, and Veterans Studies Regarding the Association Between Specific Health Problems and Exposure to Herbicides


Sufficient Evidence of an Association

Evidence is sufficient to conclude that there is a positive association. That is, a positive association has been observed between herbicides and the outcome in studies in which chance, bias, and confounding could be ruled out with reasonable confidence. For example, if several small studies that are free from bias and confounding show an association that is consistent in magnitude and direction, there may be sufficient evidence for an association. There is sufficient evidence of an association between exposure to herbicides and the following health outcomes:

Soft tissue sarcoma

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Hodgkin's disease


Porphyria cutanea tarda (in genetically susceptible individuals)


Limited/Suggestive Evidence of an Association

Evidence is suggestive of an association between herbicides and the outcome but is limited because chance, bias, and confounding could not be ruled out with confidence. For example, at least one high-quality study shows a positive association, but the results of other studies are inconsistent. There is limited/suggestive evidence of an association between exposure to herbicides and the following health outcomes:

Respiratory cancers (lung, larynx, trachea)

Prostate cancer

Multiple myeloma


Indequate/Insufficient Evidence to Determine Whether an Association Exists

The available studies are of insufficient quality, consistency, or statistical power to permit a conclusion regarding the presence or absence of an association. For example, studies fail to control for confounding, have inadequate exposure assessment, or fail to address latency. There is inadequate or insufficient evidence to determine whether an association exists between exposure to herbicides and the following health outcomes:

Hepatobiliary cancers

Nasal/nasopharyngeal cancer

Bone cancer

Female reproductive cancers (breast, cervical, uterine, ovarian)

Renal cancer

Testicular cancer


Spontaneous abortion

Birth defects

Neonatal/infant death and stillbirths

Low birthweight

Childhood cancer in offspring

Abnormal sperm parameters and infertility


Inadequate/Insufficient Evidence to Determine Whether an Association Exists

Cognitive and neuropsychiatric disorders

Motor/coordination dysfunction

Peripheral nervous system disorders

Metabolic and digestive disorders (diabetes, changes in liver enzymes, lipid abnormalities, ulcers)

Immune system disorders (immune modulation and autoimmunity)

Circulatory disorders

Respiratory disorders


Limited/Suggestive Evidence of No Association

Several adequate studies, covering the full range of levels of exposure that human beings are known to encounter, are mutually consistent in not showing a positive association between exposure to herbicides and the outcome at any level of exposure. A conclusion of 'no association' is inevitably limited to the conditions, level of exposure, and length of observation covered by the available studies. In addition, the possibility of a very small elevation in risk at the levels of exposure studied can never be excluded. There is limited/suggestive evidence of no association between exposure to herbicides and the following health outcomes:

Skin cancer

Gastrointestinal tumors (stomach cancer, pancreatic cancer, colon cancer, rectal cancer)

Bladder cancer

Brain tumors

NOTE: 'Herbicides' refers to the major herbicides used in Vietnam: 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid); 2,4,5-T (2,4,5-tricbIorophenoxyacetic acid) and its contaminant TCDD (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin); cacodylic acid; and picloram. The evidence regarding association is drawn from occupational and other studies in which subjects were exposed to a variety of herbicides and herbicide components.


 AO links 

Institute of Medicine Health of Veterans and Deployed Forces  New!

Agent Orange Lawsuit  Posted 7-15-03

Statistical Summary

Veterans and Agent Orange - NAS study text Air Force Health Study on Agent Orange
Veterans and Agent Orange - 1996 Update Article by William A. Buckingham, Jr., PhD
Veterans and Agent Orange - 1998 Update Veterans Administration
DioxinKills Veterans' Benefits
Agent Orange Registry Poisoning of New Zealand
The Frustration Continues Agent Orange Website
Zumwalt Report - May 1990
Executive Summary - The Herbicidal Warfare Program in Vietnam, 1961-1971

 VISITORs since 12-1-2001    Hit Counter



[Complete list of US Army Vietnam artillery units]
[home]  [site map]  [contact us[
guestbook]  [welcome]  [search site]  [terms of use]
[WW1]  [WW2]  [Korean War]  [Vietnam War]  [Iraq War]
[what's new]  [links]  [announcements]  [15th reunions]

Attention 15th Field Artillery veterans!

Contact Davo with your unit information.
Copyright 1998-2009   LANDSCAPER.NET   All rights reserved.
Last modified 27 October 2012