Vietnam War History
and U.S. Politics
Declarations of the Geneva Conference - July 21, 1954
John F. Kennedy INAUGURAL ADDRESS
- January 20, 1961
Letter from President Kennedy to
President Diem - December 14, 1961
President Johnson's Message to
Congress - August 5, 1964
Gulf of Tonkin Resolution - August 7, 1964
Lyndon B. Johnson INAUGURAL ADDRESS -
January 20, 1965
STATE DEPARTMENT WHITE PAPER
ON VIETNAM - February 27, 1965
OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS TREATY (1968)
Richard M. Nixon INAUGURAL ADDRESS -
January 20, 1969
Soldier Investigation - 1/31/71, 2/1/71, 2/2/71 (Off-site)
by John Kerry to the Senate - April 23, 1971
A Veteran Speaks--Against the
War Bob Muller - July 23, 1971
from President Nixon to President Thieu - January 5, 1973
Richard M. Nixon INAUGURAL ADDRESS -
January 20, 1973
With Honor" broadcast by President Nixon January 23, 1973
Excerpts from the
Paris Accords - January 27, 1973
Resignation of Vice
President Agnew - October 10, 1973
War Powers Resolution - November 7, 1973
Resignation of President Nixon -
August 8, 1974
Clinton's Remarks to Vietnam University - November 17, 2000
The Final Declarations
of the Geneva Conference
July 21, 1954
1. The Conference takes note of the Agreements
ending hostilities in Cambodia, Laos, and Viet-Nam and organizing international control
and the supervision of the execution of the provisions of these
2. The Conference expresses satisfaction at the
ending of hostilities in Cambodia, Laos, and Viet-Nam; the Conference expresses its
conviction that the execution of the provisions set out in the present Declaration and in
the Agreements on the cessation of hostilities will permit Cambodia, Laos and Viet-Nam
henceforth to play their part, in full independence and sovereignty, in the peaceful
community of nations.
3. The Conference takes note of the declarations
made by the Governments of Cambodia and of Laos of their intention to adopt measures
permitting all citizens to take their place in the national community, in particular by
participating in the next general elections, which, in conformity with the constitution of
each of these countries, shall take place in the course of the year 1955, by secret ballot
and in conditions of respect for fundamental freedoms.
4. The Conference takes note of the clauses in the
Agreement on the cessation of hostilities in Viet-Nam prohibiting the introduction into
Vietnam of foreign troops and military personnel as well as all kinds of arms and
munitions. The Conference also takes note of the declarations made by the Governments of
Cambodia and Laos of their resolution not to request foreign aid, whether in war material,
in personnel or in instructors except for the purpose of the effective defence of their
territory and, in the case of Laos, to the extent defined by the Agreements on the
cessation of hostilities in Laos.
5. The Conference takes note of the clauses in the
Agreement on the cessation of hostilities in Viet-nam to the effect that no military base
under the control of a foreign State may be established in the regrouping zones of the two
parties, the latter having the obligation to see that the zones allotted to them shall not
constitute part of any military alliance and shall not be utilized for the resumption of
hostilities or in the service of an aggressive policy. The Conference also takes note of
the declarations of the Governments of Cambodia and Laos to the effect that they will not
join in any agreement with other States if this agreement includes the obligation to
participate in a military alliance not in conformity with the principles of the Charter of
the United Nations or, in the case of Laos, with the principles of the Agreement on the
cessation of hostilities in Laos or, so long as their security is not threatened, the
obligation to establish bases on Cambodian or Laotian territory for the military forces of
6. The Conference recognizes that the essential
purpose of the Agreement relating to Viet-nam is to settle military questions with a view
to ending hostilities and that the military demarcation line is provisional and should not
in any way be interpreted as constituting a political or territorial boundary. The
Conference expresses its conviction that the execution of the provisions set out in the
present Declaration and in the Agreement on the cessation of hostilities creates the
necessary basis for the achievement in the near future of a political settlement in
7. The Conference declares that, so far as
Viet-nam is concerned, the settlement of political problems, effected on the basis of
respect for principles of independence, unity and territorial integrity, shall permit the
Vietnamese people to enjoy the fundamental freedoms, guaranteed by democratic institutions
established as a result of free general elections by secret ballot. In order to ensure
that sufficient progress in the restoration of peace has been made and that all the
necessary conditions obtain for free expression of the national will, general elections
shall be held in July 1956, under the supervision of an international commission composed
of representatives of the Member States of the International Supervisory Commission,
referred to in the Agreement on the cessation of hostilities. Consultations will be held
on this subject between the competent representative authorities of the two zones from 20
July, 1955 onwards.
8. The provisions of the Agreements on the
cessation of hostilities intended to ensure the protection of individuals and of property
must be most strictly applied and must, in particular, allow everyone in Viet-nam to
decide freely in which zone he wishes to live.
9. The competent representative authorities of the
Northern and Southern zones of Viet-nam, as well as the authorities of Laos and Cambodia,
must not permit any individual or collective reprisals against persons who have
collaborated in any way with one of the parties during the war, or against members of such
10. The Conference takes note of the declaration
of the Government of the French Republic to the effect that it is ready to withdraw its
troops from the territory of Cambodia, Laos and Viet-Nam, at the request of the
governments concerned and within periods which shall be fixed by agreement between the
parties except in the cases where, by agreement between the two parties, a certain number
of French troops shall remain at specified points and for a specified time.
11. The Conference takes note of the declaration
of the French Government to the effect that for the settlement of all the problems
connected with the re-establishment and consolidation of peace in Cambodia, Laos and
Viet-Nam, the French Government will proceed from the principle of respect for the
independence and sovereignty, unity and territorial integrity of Cambodia, Laos and
12. In their relations with Cambodia, Laos and
Viet-nam, each member of the Geneva Conference undertakes to respect the sovereignty, the
independence, the unity and the territorial integrity of the above-mentioned States, and
to refrain from any interference in their internal affairs.
13. The members of the Conference agree to consult
one another on any question which may be referred to them by the International Supervisory
Commission, in order to study such measures as may prove necessary to ensure that the
Agreements on the cessation of hostilities in Cambodia, Laos and Viet-nam are respected.
JANUARY 20, 1961
Vice President Johnson, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Chief Justice,
President Eisenhower, Vice President Nixon, President Truman, reverend clergy, fellow
citizens, we observe today not a victory of party, but a celebration of
freedom--symbolizing an end, as well as a beginning--signifying renewal, as well as
change. For I have sworn I before you and Almighty God the same solemn oath our forebears
l prescribed nearly a century and three quarters ago.
The world is very different now. For man holds in his
mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty and all forms of human life.
And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue
around the globe--the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the
state, but from the hand of God.
We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of that
first revolution. Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike,
that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans--born in this century,
tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient
heritage--and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to
which this Nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home
and around the world.
Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill,
that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend,
oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty.
This much we pledge--and more.
To those old allies whose cultural and spiritual origins
we share, we pledge the loyalty of faithful friends. United, there is little we cannot do
in a host of cooperative ventures. Divided, there is little we can do--for we dare not
meet a powerful challenge at odds and split asunder.
To those new States whom we welcome to the ranks of the
free, we pledge our word that one form of colonial control shall not have passed away
merely to be replaced by a far more iron tyranny. We shall not always expect to find them
supporting our view. But we shall always hope to find them strongly supporting their own
freedom--and to remember that, in the past, those who foolishly sought power by riding the
back of the tiger ended up inside.
To those peoples in the huts and villages across the
globe struggling to break the bonds of mass misery, we pledge our best efforts to help
them help themselves, for whatever period is required--not because the Communists may be
doing it, not because we seek their votes, but because it is right. If a free society
cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.
To our sister republics south of our border, we offer a
special pledge--to convert our good words into good deeds--in a new alliance for
progress--to assist free men and free governments in casting off the chains of poverty.
But this peaceful revolution of hope cannot become the prey of hostile powers. Let all our
neighbors know that we shall join with them to oppose aggression or subversion anywhere in
the Americas. And let every other power know that this Hemisphere intends to remain the
master of its own house.
To that world assembly of sovereign states, the United
Nations, our last best hope in an age where the instruments of war have far outpaced the
instruments of peace, we renew our pledge of support--to prevent it from becoming merely a
forum for invective--to strengthen its shield of the new and the weak--and to enlarge the
area in which its writ may run.
Finally, to those nations who would make themselves our
adversary, we offer not a pledge but a request: that both sides begin anew the quest for
peace, before the dark powers of destruction unleashed by science engulf all humanity in
planned or accidental self-destruction.
We dare not tempt them with weakness. For only when our
arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be
But neither can two great and powerful groups of nations
take comfort from our present course--both sides overburdened by the cost of modern
weapons, both rightly alarmed by the steady spread of the deadly atom, yet both racing to
alter that uncertain balance of terror that stays the hand of mankind's final war.
So let us begin anew--remembering on both sides that
civility is not a sign of weakness, and sincerity is always subject to proof. Let us never
negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate.
Let both sides explore what problems unite us instead of
belaboring those problems which divide us.
Let both sides, for the first time, formulate serious and
precise proposals for the inspection and control of arms--and bring the absolute power to
destroy other nations under the absolute control of all nations.
Let both sides seek to invoke the wonders of science
instead of its terrors. Together let us explore the stars, conquer the deserts, eradicate
disease, tap the ocean depths, and encourage the arts and commerce.
Let both sides unite to heed in all corners of the earth
the command of Isaiah--to "undo the heavy burdens ... and to let the oppressed go
And if a beachhead of cooperation may push back the
jungle of suspicion, let both sides join in creating a new endeavor, not a new balance of
power, but a new world of law, where the strong are just and the weak secure and the peace
All this will not be finished in the first 100 days. Nor
will it be finished in the first 1,000 days, nor in the life of this Administration, nor
even perhaps in our lifetime on this planet. But let us begin.
In your hands, my fellow citizens, more than in mine,
will rest the final success or failure of our course. Since this country was founded, each
generation of Americans has been summoned to give testimony to its national loyalty. The
graves of young Americans who answered the call to service surround the globe.
Now the trumpet summons us again--not as a call to bear
arms, though arms we need; not as a call to battle, though embattled we are--but a call to
bear the burden of a long twilight struggle, year in and year out, "rejoicing in
hope, patient in tribulation"--a struggle against the common enemies of man: tyranny,
poverty, disease, and war itself.
Can we forge against these enemies a grand and global
alliance, North and South, East and West, that can assure a more fruitful life for all
mankind? Will you join in that historic effort?
In the long history of the world, only a few generations
have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not
shank from this responsibility--I welcome it. I do not believe that any of us would
exchange places with any other people or any other generation. The energy, the faith, the
devotion which we bring to this endeavor will light our country and all who serve it--and
the glow from that fire can truly light the world.
And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country
can do for you--ask what you can do for your country.
My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America
will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man.
Finally, whether you are citizens of America or citizens
of the world, ask of us the same high standards of strength and sacrifice which we ask of
you. With a good conscience our only sure reward, with history the final judge of our
deeds, let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but
knowing that here on earth God's work must truly be our own.
Letter from President Kennedy
to President Diem
Dear Mr. President:
I have received your recent letter in which you described
so cogently the dangerous condition caused by North Vietnam's efforts to take over your
country. The situation in your embattled country is well known to me and to the American
people. We have been deeply disturbed by the assault on your country. Our indignation has
mounted as the deliberate savagery of the Communist program of assassination, kidnapping,
and wanton violence became clear.
Your letter underlines what our own information has
convincingly shown - that the campaign of force and terror now being waged against your
people and your government is supported and directed from the outside by the authorities
at Hanoi. They have thus violated the provisions of the Geneva Accords designed to ensure
peace in Vietnam and to which they are bound themselves in 1954.
At that time, the United States, although not a party to
the Accords, declared that it "would view any renewal of the aggression in violation
of the Agreements with grave concern and as seriously threatening international peace and
security." We continue to maintain that view.
In accordance with that declaration, and in response to
your request, we are prepared to help the Republic of Vietnam to protect its people and to
preserve its independence. We shall promptly increase our assistance to your defense efort
as well as help relieve the destruction of the floods which you describe. I have already
given the orders to get those programs underway.
The United States, like the Republic of Vietnam, remains
devoted to the cause of peace and our primary purpose is to help your people maintain
their independence. If the Communist authorities in North Vietnam will stop their campaign
to destroy the Republic of Vietnam, the measures we are taking to assist your defense
efforts will no longer be necesary. We shall seek to persuade the Communists to give up
their attempts of force and subversion. In any case, we are confident that the Vietnamese
people will preserve their independence and gain the peace and prosperity for which they
have fought so hard and so long.
President Johnson's Message
the Tonkin Gulf incident
Last night I announced to the American people that the
North Vietnamese regime had conducted further deliberate attacks against U.S. naval
vessels operating in international waters, and I had therefore directed air action against
gunboats and supporting facilities used in these hostile operations. This air action has
now been carried out with substantial damage to the boats and facilities. Two U.S.
aircraft were lost in the action. After consultation with the leaders of both parties in
the Congress, I further announced a decision to ask the Congress for a resolution
expressing the unity and determination of the United States in supporting freedom and in
protecting peace in southeast Asia. These latest actions of the North Vietnamese regime
has given a new and grave turn to the already serious situation in southeast Asia. Our
commitments in that area are well known to the Congress. They were first made in 1954 by
President Eisenhower. They were further defined in the Southeast Asia Collective Defense
Treaty approved by the Senate in February 1955. This treaty with its accompanying protocol
obligates the United States and other members to act in accordance with their
constitutional processes to meet Communist aggression against any of the parties or
protocol states. Our policy in southeast Asia has been consistent and unchanged since
19554. I summarized it on June 2 in four simple propositions: 1. America keeps her word.
Here as elsewhere, we must and shall honor our commitments. 2. The issue is the future of
southeast Asia as a whole. A threat to any nation in that region is a threat to all, and a
threat to us. 3. Our purpose is peace. We have no military, political, or territorial
ambitions in the area. 4. This is not just a jungle war, but a struggle for freedom on
every front of human activity. Our military and economic assistance to South Vietnam and
Laos in particular has the purpose of helping these countries to repel aggression and
strengthen their independence. The threat to the free nations of southeast Asia has long
been clear. The North Vietnamese regime has constantly sought to take over South Vietnam
and Laos. This Communist regime has violated the Geneva accords for Vietnam. It has
systematically conducted a campaign of subversion, which includes the direction, training,
and supply of personnel and arms for the conduct of guerrilla warfare in South Vietnamese
territory. In Laos, the North Vietnamese regime has maintained military forces, used
Laotian territory for infiltration into South Vietnam, and most recently carried out
combat operations - all in direct violation of the Geneva Agreements of 1962. In recent
months, the actions of the North Vietnamese regime have become steadily more
threatening... As President of the United States I have concluded that I should now ask
the Congress, on its part, to join in affirming the national determination that all such
attacks will be met, and that the United States will continue in its basic policy of
assisting the free nations of the area to defend their freedom. As I have repeatedly made
clear, the United States intends no rashness, and seeks no wider war. We must make it
clear to all that the United States is united in its determination to bring about the end
of Communist subversion and aggression in the area. We seek the full and effective
restoration of the international agreements signed in Geneva in 1954, with respect to
South Vietnam, and again in Geneva in 1962, with respect to Laos... 2. Joint Resolution of
Congress H.J. RES 1145 August 7, 1964 (Department of State Bulletin, August 24, 1964)
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in
Congress assembled, That the Congress approves and supports the determination of the
President, as Commander in Chief, to take all necessary measures to repel any armed attack
against the forces of the United States and to prevent further aggression. Section 2. The
United States regards as vital to its national interest and to world peace the maintenance
of international peace and security in southeast Asia. Consonant with the Constitution of
the United States and the Charter of the United Nations and in accordance with its
obligations under the Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty, the United States is,
therefore, prepared, as the President determines, to take all necessary steps, including
the use of armed force, to assist any member or protocol state of the Southeast Asia
Collective Defense Treaty requesting assistance in defense of its freedom. Section 3. This
resolution shall expire when the President shall determine that the peace and security of
the area is reasonably assured by international conditions created by action of the United
Nations or otherwise, except that it may be terminated earlier by concurrent resolution of
Also see: 30-Year Anniversary: Tonkin Gulf Lie
Launched Vietnam War
Gulf of Tonkin Resolution
H.J. RES 1145
August 7, 1964
Resolved by the Senate and House of
Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
That the Congress approves and supports the determination
of the President, as Commander in Chief, to take all necessary measures to repel any armed
attack against the forces of the United States and to prevent further aggression.
Section 2. The United States regards as vital to its
national interest and to world peace the maintenance of international peace and security
in southeast Asia. Consonant with the Constitution of the United States and the Charter of
the United Nations and in accordance with its obligations under the Southeast Asia
Collective Defense Treaty, the United States is, therefore, prepared, as the President
determines, to take all necessary steps, including the use of armed force, to assist any
member or protocol state of the Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty requesting
assistance in defense of its freedom.
Section 3. This resolution shall expire when the
President shall determine that the peace and security of the area is reasonably assured by
international conditions created by action of the United Nations or otherwise, except that
it may be terminated earlier by concurrent resolution of the Congress.
JANUARY 20, 1965
My fellow countrymen, on this occasion, the oath I have
taken before you and before God is not mine alone, but ours together. We are one nation
and one people. Our fate as a nation and our future as a people rest not upon one citizen,
but upon all citizens.
This is the majesty and the meaning of this moment.
For every generation, there is a destiny. For some,
history decides. For this generation, the choice must be our own.
Even now, a rocket moves toward Mars. It reminds us that
the world will not be the same for our children, or even for ourselves m a short span of
years. The next man to stand here will look out on a scene different from our own, because
ours is a time of change-- rapid and fantastic change bearing the secrets of nature,
multiplying the nations, placing in uncertain hands new weapons for mastery and
destruction, shaking old values, and uprooting old ways.
Our destiny in the midst of change will rest on the
unchanged character of our people, and on their faith.
THE AMERICAN COVENANT
They came here--the exile and the stranger, brave but
frightened-- to find a place where a man could be his own man. They made a covenant with
this land. Conceived in justice, written in liberty, bound in union, it was meant one day
to inspire the hopes of all mankind; and it binds us still. If we keep its terms, we shall
JUSTICE AND CHANGE
First, justice was the promise that all who made the
journey would share in the fruits of the land.
In a land of great wealth, families must not live in
hopeless poverty. In a land rich in harvest, children just must not go hungry. In a land
of healing miracles, neighbors must not suffer and die unattended. In a great land of
learning and scholars, young people must be taught to read and write.
For the more than 30 years that I have served this
Nation, I have believed that this injustice to our people, this waste of our resources,
was our real enemy. For 30 years or more, with the resources I have had, I have vigilantly
fought against it. I have learned, and I know, that it will not surrender easily.
But change has given us new weapons. Before this
generation of Americans is finished, this enemy will not only retreat--it will be
Justice requires us to remember that when any citizen
denies his fellow, saying, "His color is not mine," or "His beliefs are
strange and different," in that moment he betrays America, though his forebears
created this Nation.
LIBERTY AND CHANGE
Liberty was the second article of our covenant. It was
self- government. It was our Bill of Rights. But it was more. America would be a place
where each man could be proud to be himself: stretching his talents, rejoicing in his
work, important in the life of his neighbors and his nation.
This has become more difficult in a world where change
and growth seem to tower beyond the control and even the judgment of men. We must work to
provide the knowledge and the surroundings which can enlarge the possibilities of every
The American covenant called on us to help show the way
for the liberation of man. And that is today our goal. Thus, if as a nation there is much
outside our control, as a people no stranger is outside our hope.
Change has brought new meaning to that old mission. We
can never again stand aside, prideful in isolation. Terrific dangers and troubles that we
once called "foreign" now constantly live among us. If American lives must end,
and American treasure be spilled, in countries we barely know, that is the price that
change has demanded of conviction and of our enduring covenant.
Think of our world as it looks from the rocket that is
heading toward Mars. It is like a child's globe, hanging in space, the continents stuck to
its side like colored maps. We are all fellow passengers on a dot of earth. And each of
us, in the span of time, has really only a moment among our companions.
How incredible it is that in this fragile existence, we
should hate and destroy one another. There are possibilities enough for all who will
abandon mastery over others to pursue mastery over nature. There is world enough for all
to seek their happiness in their own way.
Our Nation's course is abundantly clear. We aspire to
nothing that belongs to others. We seek no dominion over our fellow man. but man's
dominion over tyranny and misery.
But more is required. Men want to be a part of a common
enterprise--a cause greater than themselves. Each of us must find a way to advance the
purpose of the Nation, thus finding new purpose for ourselves. Without this, we shall
become a nation of strangers.
UNION AND CHANGE
The third article was union. To those who were small and
few against the wilderness, the success of liberty demanded the strength of union. Two
centuries of change have made this true again.
No longer need capitalist and worker, farmer and clerk,
city and countryside, struggle to divide our bounty. By working shoulder to shoulder,
together we can increase the bounty of all. We have discovered that every child who
learns, every man who finds work, every sick body that is made whole--like a candle added
to an altar--brightens the hope of all the faithful.
So let us reject any among us who seek to reopen old
wounds and to rekindle old hatreds. They stand in the way of a seeking nation.
Let us now join reason to faith and action to experience,
to transform our unity of interest into a unity of purpose. For the hour and the day and
the time are here to achieve progress without strife, to achieve change without
hatred--not without difference of opinion, but without the deep and abiding divisions
which scar the union for generations.
THE AMERICAN BELIEF
Under this covenant of justice, liberty, and union we
have become a nation--prosperous, great, and mighty. And we have kept our freedom. But we
have no promise from God that our greatness will endure. We have been allowed by Him to
seek greatness with the sweat of our hands and the strength of our spirit.
I do not believe that the Great Society is the ordered,
changeless, and sterile battalion of the ants. It is the excitement of becoming--always
becoming, trying, probing, falling, resting, and trying again--but always trying and
In each generation, with toil and tears, we have had to
earn our heritage again.
If we fail now, we shall have forgotten in abundance what
we learned in hardship: that democracy rests on faith, that freedom asks more than it
gives, and that the judgment of God is harshest on those who are most favored.
If we succeed, it will not be because of what we have,
but it will be because of what we are; not because of what we own, but, rather because of
what we believe.
For we are a nation of believers. Underneath the clamor
of building and the rush of our day's pursuits, we are believers in justice and liberty
and union, and in our own Union. We believe that every man must someday be free. And we
believe in ourselves.
Our enemies have always made the same mistake. In my
lifetime--in depression and in war--they have awaited our defeat. Each time, from the
secret places of the American heart, came forth the faith they could not see or that they
could not even imagine. It brought us victory. And it will again.
For this is what America is all about. It is the
uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the
harvest sleeping in the unplowed ground. Is our world gone? We say "Farewell."
Is a new world coming? We welcome it--and we will bend it to the hopes of man.
To these trusted public servants and to my family and
those close friends of mine who have followed me down a long, winding road, and to all the
people of this Union and the world, I will repeat today what I said on that sorrowful day
in November 1963: "I will lead and I will do the best I can."
But you must look within your own hearts to the old
promises and to the old dream. They will lead you best of all.
For myself, I ask only, in the words of an ancient
leader: "Give me now wisdom and knowledge, that I may go out and come in before this
people: for who can judge this thy people, that is so great?"
WHITE PAPER ON VIETNAM
FROM THE NORTH"
February 27, 1965
(Department of State Bulletin, March 22, 1965)
South Vietnam is fighting for its life against a brutal campaign of terror and armed
attack inspired, directed, supplied, and controlled by the Communist regime in Hanoi. This
flagrant aggression has been going on for years, but recently the pace has quickened and
the threat has now become acute. The war in Vietnam is a new kind of war, a fact as yet
poorly understood in most parts of the world. Much of the confusion that prevails in the
thinking of many people, and even governments, stems from this basic misunderstanding. For
in Vietnam a totally new brand of aggression has been loosed against an independent people
who want to make their way in peace and freedom. Vietnam is not another Greece, where
indigenous guerrilla forces used friendly neighboring territory as a sanctuary. Vietnam is
not another Malaya, where Communist guerrillas were, for the most part, physically
distinguishable from the peaceful majority they sought to control. Vietnam is not another
Philippines, where Communist guerrillas were physically separated from the source of their
moral and physical support. Above all, the war in Vietnam is not a spontaneous and local
rebellion against the established government. There are elements in the Communist program
of conquest directed against South Vietnam common to each of the previous areas of
aggression and subversion. But there is one fundamental difference. In Vietnam a Communist
government has set out deliberately to conquer a sovereign people in a neighboring state.
And to achieve its end, it has used every resource of its own government to carry out its
carefully planned program of concealed aggression. North Vietnam's commitment to seize
control of the South is no less total than was the commitment of the regime in North Korea
in 1950. But knowing the consequences of the latter's undisguised attack, the planners in
Hanoi have tried desperately to conceal their hand. They have failed and their aggression
is as real as that of an invading army. This report is a summary of the massive evidence
of North Vietnamese aggression obtained by the Government of South Vietnam. This evidence
has been jointly analyzed by South Vietnamese and American experts. The evidence shows
that the hard core of the Communist forces attacking South Vietnam were trained in the
North and ordered into the South by Hanoi. It shows that the key leadership of the
Vietcong (VC), the officers and much of the cadre, many of the technicians, political
organizers, and propagandists have come from the North and operate under Hanoi's
direction. It shows that the training of essential military personnel and their
infiltration into the South is directed by the Military High Command in Hanoi. In recent
months new types of weapons have been introduced in the VC army, for which all ammunition
must come from outside sources. Communist China and other Communist states have been the
prime suppliers of these weapons and ammunition, and they have been channeled primarily
through North Vietnam. The directing force behind the effort to conqueror South Vietnam is
the Communist Party in the North, the Lao Dong (Workers) Party. As in every Communist
state. the party is an integral part of the regime itself. North Vietnamese officials have
expressed their firm determination to absorb South Vietnam into the Communist world.
Through its Central Committee, which controls the Government of the North, the Lao Dong
Party directs the total political and military effort of the Vietcong. The Military High
Command in the North trains the military men and sends them into South Vietnam. The
Central Research Agency, North Vietnam's central intelligence organization, directs the
elaborate espionage and subversion effort... Under Hanoi's overall direction the
Communists have established an extensive machine for carrying on the war within South
Vietnam. The focal point is the Central Office for South Vietnam with its political and
military subsections and other specialized agencies. A subordinate part of this Central
Office is the liberation Front for South Vietnam. The front was formed at Hanoi's order in
1960. Its principle function is to influence opinion abroad and to create the false
impression that the aggression in South Vietnam is an indigenous rebellion against the
established Government. For more than 10 years the people and the Government of South
Vietnam, exercising the inherent right of self-defense, have fought back against these
efforts to extend Communist power south across the 17th parallel. The United States has
responded to the appeals of the Government of the Republic of Vietnam for help in this
defense of the freedom and independence of its land and its people. In 1961 the Department
of State issued a report called A Threat to the Peace. It described North Vietnam's
program to seize South Vietnam. The evidence in that report had been presented by the
Government of the Republic of Vietnam to the International Control Commission (ICC). A
special report by the ICC in June 1962 upheld the validity of that evidence. The
Commission held that there was "sufficient evidence to show beyond reasonable
doubt" that North Vietnam had sent arms and men into South Vietnam to carry out
subversion with the aim of overthrowing the legal Government there. The ICC found the
authorities in Hanoi in specific violation of four provisions of the Geneva Accords of
1954. Since then, new and even more impressive evidence of Hanoi's aggression has
accumulated. The Government of the United States believes that evidence should be
presented to its own citizens and to the world. It is important for free men to know what
has been happening in Vietnam, and how, and why. That is the purpose of this report... The
record is conclusive. It establishes beyond question that North Vietnam is carrying out a
carefully conceived plan of aggression against the South. It shows that North Vietnam has
intensified its efforts in the years since it was condemned by the International Control
Commission. It proves that Hanoi continues to press its systematic program of armed
aggression into South Vietnam. This aggression violates the United Nations Charter. It is
directly contrary to the Geneva Accords of 1954 and of 1962 to which North Vietnam is a
party. It is a fundamental threat to the freedom and security of South Vietnam. The people
of South Vietnam have chosen to resist this threat. At their request, the United States
has taken its place beside them in their defensive struggle. The United States seeks no
territory, no military bases, no favored position. But we have learned the meaning of
aggression elsewhere in the post-war world, and we have met it. If peace can be restored
in South Vietnam, the United States will be ready at once to reduce its military
involvement. But it will not abandon friends who want to remain free. It will do what must
be done to help them. The choice now between peace and continued and increasingly
destructive conflict is one for the authorities in Hanoi to make.
ON THE NON-PROLIFERATION
OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS - 1968
ENTERED INTO FORCE: 5 March 1970
The States concluding this Treaty, hereinafter referred
to as the "Parties to the Treaty",
Considering the devastation that would be visited upon
all mankind by a nuclear war and the consequent need to make every effort to avert the
danger of such a war and to take measures to safeguard the security of peoples,
Believing that the proliferation of nuclear weapons would
seriously enhance the danger of nuclear war,
In conformity with resolutions of the United Nations
General Assembly calling for the conclusion of an agreement on the prevention of wider
dissemination of nuclear weapons,
Undertaking to co-operate in facilitating the application
of International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards on peaceful nuclear activities,
Expressing their support for research, development and
other efforts to further the application, within the framework of the International Atomic
Energy Agency safeguards system, of the principle of safeguarding effectively the flow of
source and special fissionable materials by use of instruments and other techniques at
certain strategic points,
Affirming the principle that the benefits of peaceful
applications of nuclear technology, including any technological by-products which may be
derived by nuclear-weapon States from the development of nuclear explosive devices, should
be available for peaceful purposes to all Parties to the Treaty, whether nuclear-weapon or
Convinced that, in furtherance of this principle, all
Parties to the Treaty are entitled to participate in the fullest possible exchange of
scientific information for, and to contribute alone or in co-operation with other States
to, the further development of the applications of atomic energy for peaceful purposes,
Declaring their intention to achieve at the earliest
possible date the cessation of the nuclear arms race and to undertake effective measures
in the direction of nuclear disarmament,
Urging the co-operation of all States in the attainment
of this objective,
Recalling the determination expressed by the Parties to
the 1963 Treaty banning nuclear weapon tests in the atmosphere, in outer space and under
water in its Preamble to seek to achieve the discontinuance of all test explosions of
nuclear weapons for all time and to continue negotiations to this end,
Desiring to further the easing of international tension
and the strengthening of trust between States in order to facilitate the cessation of the
manufacture of nuclear weapons, the liquidation of all their existing stockpiles, and the
elimination from national arsenals of nuclear weapons and the means of their delivery
pursuant to a Treaty on general and complete disarmament under strict and effective
Recalling that, in accordance with the Charter of the
United Nations, States must refrain in their international relations from the threat or
use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or
in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations, and that the
establishment and maintenance of international peace and security are to be promoted with
the least diversion for armaments of the world's human and economic resources,
Have agreed as follows:
Each nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes
not to transfer to any recipient whatsoever nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive
devices or control over such weapons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly; and not
in any way to assist, encourage, or induce any non-nuclear-weapon State to manufacture or
otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices, or control over such
weapons or explosive devices.
Each non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty
undertakes not to receive the transfer from any transferor whatsoever of nuclear weapons
or other nuclear explosive devices or of control over such weapons or explosive devices
directly, or indirectly; not to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other
nuclear explosive devices; and not to seek or receive any assistance in the manufacture of
nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.
1. Each non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty
undertakes to accept safeguards, as set forth in an agreement to be negotiated and
concluded with the International Atomic Energy Agency in accordance with the Statute of
the International Atomic Energy Agency and the Agency's safeguards system, for the
exclusive purpose of verification of the fulfilment of its obligations assumed under this
Treaty with a view to preventing diversion of nuclear energy from peaceful uses to nuclear
weapons or other nuclear explosive devices. Procedures for the safeguards required by this
Article shall be followed with respect to source or special fissionable material whether
it is being produced, processed or used in any principal nuclear facility or is outside
any such facility. The safeguards required by this Article shall be applied on all source
or special fissionable material in all peaceful nuclear activities within the territory of
such State, under its jurisdiction, or carried out under its control anywhere. 2. Each
State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to provide: (a) source or special fissionable
material, or (b) equipment or material especially designed or prepared for the processing,
use or production of special fissionable material, to any non-nuclear-weapon State for
peaceful purposes, unless the source or special fissionable material shall be subject to
the safeguards required by this Article. 3. The safeguards required by this Article shall
be implemented in a manner designed to comply with Article IV of this Treaty, and to avoid
hampering the economic or technological development of the Parties or international
co-operation in the field of peaceful nuclear activities, including the international
exchange of nuclear material and equipment for the processing, use or production of
nuclear material for peaceful purposes in accordance with the provisions of this Article
and the principle of safeguarding set forth in the Preamble of the Treaty. 4.
Non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty shall conclude agreements with the
International Atomic Energy Agency to meet the requirements of this Article either
individually or together with other States in accordance with the Statute of the
International Atomic Energy Agency. Negotiation of such agreements shall commence within
180 days from the original entry into force of this Treaty. For States depositing their
instruments of ratification or accession after the 180-day period, negotiation of such
agreements shall commence not later than the date of such deposit. Such agreements shall
enter into force not later than eighteen months after the date of initiation of
1. Nothing in this Treaty shall be interpreted as
affecting the inalienable right of all the Parties to the Treaty to develop research,
production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination and in
conformity with Articles I and II of this Treaty. 2. All the Parties to the Treaty
undertake to facilitate, and have the right to participate in, the fullest possible
exchange of equipment, materials and scientific and technological information for the
peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Parties to the Treaty in a position to do so shall also
co-operate in contributing alone or together with other States or international
organizations to the further development of the applications of nuclear energy for
peaceful purposes, especially in the territories of non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the
Treaty, with due consideration for the needs of the developing areas of the world.
Each Party to the Treaty undertakes to take appropriate
measures to ensure that, in accordance with this Treaty, under appropriate international
observation and through appropriate international procedures, potential benefits from any
peaceful applications of nuclear explosions will be made available to non-nuclear-weapon
States Party to the Treaty on a non-discriminatory basis and that the charge to such
Parties for the explosive devices used will be as low as possible and exclude any charge
for research and development. Non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty shall be able
to obtain such benefits, pursuant to a special international agreement or agreements,
through an appropriate international body with adequate representation of
non-nuclear-weapon States. Negotiations on this subject shall commence as soon as possible
after the Treaty enters into force. Non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty so
desiring may also obtain such benefits pursuant to bilateral agreements.
Each of the Parties to the Treaty undertakes to pursue
negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms
race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament, and on a treaty on general and complete
disarmament under strict and effective international control.
Nothing in this Treaty affects the right of any group of
States to conclude regional treaties in order to assure the total absence of nuclear
weapons in their respective territories.
1. Any Party to the Treaty may propose amendments to this
Treaty. The text of any proposed amendment shall be submitted to the Depositary
Governments which shall circulate it to all Parties to the Treaty. Thereupon, if requested
to do so by one-third or more of the Parties to the Treaty, the Depositary Governments
shall convene a conference, to which they shall invite all the Parties to the Treaty, to
consider such an amendment. 2. Any amendment to this Treaty must be approved by a majority
of the votes of all the Parties to the Treaty, including the votes of all nuclear-weapon
States Party to the Treaty and all other Parties which, on the date the amendment is
circulated, are members of the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy
Agency. The amendment shall enter into force for each Party that deposits its instrument
of ratification of the amendment upon the deposit of such instruments of ratification by a
majority of all the Parties, including the instruments of ratification of all
nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty and all other Parties which, on the date the
amendment is circulated, are members of the Board of Governors of the International Atomic
Energy Agency. Thereafter, it shall enter into force for any other Party upon the deposit
of its instrument of ratification of the amendment. 3. Five years after the entry into
force of this Treaty, a conference of Parties to the Treaty shall be held in Geneva,
Switzerland, in order to review the operation of this Treaty with a view to assuring that
the purposes of the Preamble and the provisions of the Treaty are being realised. At
intervals of five years thereafter, a majority of the Parties to the Treaty may obtain, by
submitting a proposal to this effect to the Depositary Governments, the convening of
further conferences with the same objective of reviewing the operation of the Treaty.
1. This Treaty shall be open to all States for signature.
Any State which does not sign the Treaty before its entry into force in accordance with
paragraph 3 of this Article may accede to it at any time. 2. This Treaty shall be subject
to ratification by signatory States. Instruments of ratification and instruments of
accession shall be deposited with the Governments of the United Kingdom of Great Britain
and Northern Ireland, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the United States of
America, which are hereby designated the Depositary Governments. 3. This Treaty shall
enter into force after its ratification by the States, the Governments of which are
designated Depositaries of the Treaty, and forty other States signatory to this Treaty and
the deposit of their instruments of ratification. For the purposes of this Treaty, a
nuclear-weapon State is one which has manufactured and exploded a nuclear weapon or other
nuclear explosive device prior to 1 January, 1967. 4. For States whose instruments of
ratification or accession are deposited subsequent to the entry into force of this Treaty,
it shall enter into force on the date of the deposit of their instruments of ratification
or accession. 5. The Depositary Governments shall promptly inform all signatory and
acceding States of the date of each signature, the date of deposit of each instrument of
ratification or of accession, the date of the entry into force of this Treaty, and the
date of receipt of any requests for convening a conference or other notices. 6. This
Treaty shall be registered by the Depositary Governments pursuant to Article 102 of the
Charter of the United Nations.
1. Each Party shall in exercising its national
sovereignty have the right to withdraw from the Treaty if it decides that extraordinary
events, related to the subject matter of this Treaty, have jeopardized the supreme
interests of its country. It shall give notice of such withdrawal to all other Parties to
the Treaty and to the United Nations Security Council three months in advance. Such notice
shall include a statement of the extraordinary events it regards as having jeopardized its
supreme interests. 2. Twenty-five years after the entry into force of the Treaty, a
conference shall be convened to decide whether the Treaty shall continue in force
indefinitely, or shall be extended for an additional fixed period or periods. This
decision shall be taken by a majority of the Parties to the Treaty.
This Treaty, the English, Russian, French, Spanish and
Chinese texts of which are equally authentic, shall be deposited in the archives of the
Depositary Governments. Duly certified copies of this Treaty shall be transmitted by the
Depositary Governments to the Governments of the signatory and acceding States.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned, duly authorised, have
signed this Treaty.
DONE in triplicate, at the cities of London, Moscow and
Washington, the first day of July, one thousand nine hundred and sixty-eight.
JANUARY 20, 1969
Senator Dirksen, Mr. Chief Justice, Mr. Vice President,
President Johnson, Vice President Humphrey, my fellow Americans--and my fellow citizens of
the world community:
I ask you to share with me today the majesty of this
moment. In the orderly transfer of power, we celebrate the unity that keeps us free.
Each moment in history is a fleeting time, precious and
unique. But some stand out as moments of beginning, in which courses are set that shape
decades or centuries.
This can be such a moment.
Forces now are converging that make possible, for the
first time, the hope that many of man's deepest aspirations can at last be realized. The
spiraling pace of change allows us to contemplate, within our own lifetime, advances that
once would have taken centuries.
In throwing wide the horizons of space, we have
discovered new horizons on earth.
For the first time, because the people of the world want
peace, and the leaders of the world are afraid of war, the times are on the side of peace.
Eight years from now America will celebrate its 200th
anniversary as a nation. Within the lifetime of most people now living, mankind will
celebrate that great new year which comes only once in a thousand years--the beginning of
the third millennium.
What kind of nation we will be, what kind of world we
will live in, whether we shape the future in the image of our hopes, is ours to determine
by our actions and our choices.
The greatest honor history can bestow is the title of
peacemaker. This honor now beckons America--the chance to help lead the world at last out
of the valley of turmoil, and onto that high ground of peace that man has dreamed of since
the dawn of civilization.
If we succeed, generations to come will say of us now
living that we mastered our moment, that we helped make the world safe for mankind.
This is our summons to greatness.
I believe the American people are ready to answer this
The second third of this century has been a time of proud
achievement. We have made enormous strides in science and industry and agriculture. We
have shared our wealth more broadly than ever. We have learned at last to manage a modern
economy to assure its continued growth.
We have given freedom new reach, and we have begun to
make its promise real for black as well as for white.
We see the hope of tomorrow in the youth of today. I know
America's youth. I believe in them. We can be proud that they are better educated, more
committed, more passionately driven by conscience than any generation in our history.
No people has ever been so close to the achievement of a
just and abundant society, or so possessed of the will to achieve it. Because our
strengths are so great, we can afford to appraise our weaknesses with candor and to
approach them with hope.
Standing in this same place a third of a century ago,
Franklin Delano Roosevelt addressed a Nation ravaged by depression and gripped in fear. He
could say in surveying the Nation's troubles: "They concern, thank God, only material
Our crisis today is the reverse.
We have found ourselves rich in goods, but ragged in
spirit; reaching with magnificent precision for the moon, but falling into raucous discord
We are caught in war, wanting peace. We are torn by
division, wanting unity. We see around us empty lives, wanting fulfillment. We see tasks
that need doing, waiting for hands to do them.
To a crisis of the spirit, we need an answer of the
To find that answer, we need only look within ourselves.
When we listen to "the better angels of our
nature," we find that they celebrate the simple things, the basic things--such as
goodness, decency, love, kindness.
Greatness comes in simple trappings.
The simple things are the ones most needed today if we
are to surmount what divides us, and cement what unites us.
To lower our voices would be a simple thing.
In these difficult years, America has suffered from a
fever of words; from inflated rhetoric that promises more than it can deliver; from angry
rhetoric that fans discontents into hatreds; from bombastic rhetoric that postures instead
We cannot learn from one another until we stop shouting
at one another--until we speak quietly enough so that our words can be heard as well as
For its part, government will listen. We will strive to
listen in new ways--to the voices of quiet anguish, the voices that speak without words,
the voices of the heart--to the injured voices, the anxious voices, the voices that have
despaired of being heard.
Those who have been left out, we will try to bring in.
Those left behind, we will help to catch up.
For all of our people, we will set as our goal the decent
order that makes progress possible and our lives secure.
As we reach toward our hopes, our task is to build on
what has gone before--not turning away from the old, but turning toward the new.
In this past third of a century, government has passed
more laws, spent more money, initiated more programs, than in all our previous history.
In pursuing our goals of full employment, better housing,
excellence in education; in rebuilding our cities and improving our rural areas; in
protecting our environment and enhancing the quality of life--in all these and more, we
will and must press urgently forward.
We shall plan now for the day when our wealth can be
transferred from the destruction of war abroad to the urgent needs of our people at home.
The American dream does not come to those who fall
But we are approaching the limits of what government
alone can do.
Our greatest need now is to reach beyond government, and
to enlist the legions of the concerned and the committed.
What has to be done, has to be done by government and
people together or it will not be done at all. The lesson of past agony is that without
the people we can do nothing; with the people we can do everything.
To match the magnitude of our tasks, we need the energies
of our people--enlisted not only in grand enterprises, but more importantly in those
small, splendid efforts that make headlines in the neighborhood newspaper instead of the
With these, we can build a great cathedral of the
spirit--each of us raising it one stone at a time, as he reaches out to his neighbor,
helping, caring, doing.
I do not offer a life of uninspiring ease. I do not call
for a life of grim sacrifice. I ask you to join in a high adventure--one as rich as
humanity itself, and as exciting as the times we live in.
The essence of freedom is that each of us shares in the
shaping of his own destiny.
Until he has been part of a cause larger than himself, no
man is truly whole.
The way to fulfillment is in the use of our talents; we
achieve nobility in the spirit that inspires that use.
As we measure what can be done, we shall promise only
what we know we can produce, but as we chart our goals we shall be lifted by our dreams.
No man can be fully free while his neighbor is not. To go
forward at all is to go forward together.
This means black and white together, as one nation, not
two. The laws have caught up with our conscience. What remains is to give life to what is
in the law: to ensure at last that as all are born equal in dignity before God, all are
born equal in dignity before man.
As we learn to go forward together at home, let us also
seek to go forward together with all mankind.
Let us take as our goal: where peace is unknown, make it
welcome; where peace is fragile, make it strong; where peace is temporary, make it
After a period of confrontation, we are entering an era
Let all nations know that during this administration our
lines of communication will be open.
We seek an open world--open to ideas, open to the
exchange of goods and people--a world in which no people, great or small, will live in
We cannot expect to make everyone our friend, but we can
try to make no one our enemy.
Those who would be our adversaries, we invite to a
peaceful competition--not in conquering territory or extending dominion, but in enriching
the life of man.
As we explore the reaches of space, let us go to the new
worlds together--not as new worlds to be conquered, but as a new adventure to be shared.
With those who are willing to join, let us cooperate to
reduce the burden of arms, to strengthen the structure of peace, to lift up the poor and
But to all those who would be tempted by weakness, let us
leave no doubt that we will be as strong as we need to be for as long as we need to be.
Over the past twenty years, since I first came to this
Capital as a freshman Congressman, I have visited most of the nations of the world.
I have come to know the leaders of the world, and the
great forces, the hatreds, the fears that divide the world.
I know that peace does not come through wishing for
it--that there is no substitute for days and even years of patient and prolonged
I also know the people of the world.
I have seen the hunger of a homeless child, the pain of a
man wounded in battle, the grief of a mother who has lost her son. I know these have no
ideology, no race.
I know America. I know the heart of America is good.
I speak from my own heart, and the heart of my country,
the deep concern we have for those who suffer, and those who sorrow.
I have taken an oath today in the presence of God and my
countrymen to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. To that oath I now
add this sacred commitment: I shall consecrate my office, my energies, and all the wisdom
I can summon, to the cause of peace among nations.
Let this message be heard by strong and weak alike:
The peace we seek to win is not victory over any other
people, but the peace that comes "with healing in its wings"; with compassion
for those who have suffered; with understanding for those who have opposed us; with the
opportunity for all the peoples of this earth to choose their own destiny.
Only a few short weeks ago, we shared the glory of man's
first sight of the world as God sees it, as a single sphere reflecting light in the
As the Apollo astronauts flew over the moon's gray
surface on Christmas Eve, they spoke to us of the beauty of earth--and in that voice so
clear across the lunar distance, we heard them invoke God's blessing on its goodness.
In that moment, their view from the moon moved poet
Archibald MacLeish to write:
"To see the earth as it truly is, small and blue and
beautiful in that eternal silence where it floats, is to see ourselves as riders on the
earth together, brothers on that bright loveliness in the eternal cold--brothers who know
now they are truly brothers."
In that moment of surpassing technological triumph, men
turned their thoughts toward home and humanity--seeing in that far perspective that man's
destiny on earth is not divisible; telling us that however far we reach into the cosmos,
our destiny lies not in the stars but on Earth itself, in our own hands, in our own
We have endured a long night of the American spirit. But
as our eyes catch the dimness of the first rays of dawn, let us not curse the remaining
dark. Let us gather the light.
Our destiny offers, not the cup of despair, but the
chalice of opportunity. So let us seize it, not in fear, but in gladness-- and,
"riders on the earth together," let us go forward, firm in our faith, steadfast
in our purpose, cautious of the dangers; but sustained by our confidence in the will of
God and the promise of man.
Veterans Against the War"
by John Kerry
to the Senate Committee
of Foreign Relations
April 23, 1971
I would like to talk on behalf of all those veterans and
say that several months ago in Detroit we had an investigation at which over 150 honorably
discharged, and many very highly decorated, veterans testified to war crimes committed in
Southeast Asia. These were not isolated incidents but crimes committed on a day-to-day
basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command. It is impossible to
describe to you exactly what did happen in Detroit - the emotions in the room and the
feelings of the men who were reliving their experiences in Vietnam. They relived the
absolute horror of what this country, in a sense, made them do. They told stories that at
times they had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable
telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies,
randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Ghengis Khan, shot
cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of
South Vietnam in addition to the normal ravage of war and the normal and very particular
ravaging which is done by the applied bombing power of this country. We call this
investigation the Winter Soldier Investigation. The term Winter Soldier is a play on words
of Thomas Paine's in 1776 when he spoke of the Sunshine Patriots and summertime soldiers
who deserted at Valley Forge because the going was rough. We who have come here to
Washington have come here because we feel we have to be winter soldiers now. We could come
back to this country, we could be quiet, we could hold our silence, we could not tell what
went on in Vietnam, but we feel because of what threatens this country, not the reds, but
the crimes which we are committing that threaten it, that we have to speak out.... In our
opinion and from our experience, there is nothing in South Vietnam which could happen that
realistically threatens the United States of America. And to attempt to justify the loss
of one American life in Vietnam, Cambodia or Laos by linking such loss to the preservation
of freedom, which those misfits supposedly abuse, is to us the height of criminal
hypocrisy, and it is that kind of hypocrisy which we feel has torn this country apart. We
found that not only was it a civil war, an effort by a people who had for years been
seeking their liberation from any colonial influence whatsoever, but also we found that
the Vietnamese whom we had enthusiastically molded after our own image were hard put to
take up the fight against the threat we were supposedly saving them from. We found most
people didn't even know the difference between communism and democracy. They only wanted
to work in rice paddies without helicopters strafing them and bombs with napalm burning
their villages and tearing their country apart. They wanted everything to do with the war,
particularly with this foreign presence of the United States of America, to leave them
alone in peace, and they practiced the art of survival by siding with whichever military
force was present at a particular time, be it Viet Cong, North Vietnamese or American. We
found also that all too often American men were dying in those rice paddies for want of
support from their allies. We saw first hand how monies from American taxes were used for
a corrupt dictatorial regime. We saw that many people in this country had a one-sided idea
of who was kept free by the flag, and blacks provided the highest percentage of
casualties. We saw Vietnam ravaged equally by American bombs and search and destroy
missions, as well as by Viet Cong terrorism - and yet we listened while this country tried
to blame all of the havoc on the Viet Cong. We rationalized destroying villages in order
to save them. We saw America lose her sense of morality as she accepted very coolly a My
Lai and refused to give up the image of American soldiers who hand out chocolate bars and
chewing gum. We learned the meaning of free fire zones, shooting anything that moves, and
we watched while America placed a cheapness on the lives of orientals. We watched the
United States falsification of body counts, in fact the glorification of body counts. We
listened while month after month we were told the back of the enemy was about to break. We
fought using weapons against "oriental human beings." We fought using weapons
against those people which I do not believe this country would dream of using were we
fighting in the European theater. We watched while men charged up hills because a general
said that hill has to be taken, and after losing one platoon or two platoons they marched
away to leave the hill for reoccupation by the North Vietnamese. We watched pride allow
the most unimportant battles to be blown into extravaganzas, because we couldn't lose, and
we couldn't retreat, and because it didn't matter how many American bodies were lost to
prove that point, and so there were Hamburger Hills and Khe Sanhs and Hill 81s and Fire
Base 6s, and so many others. Now we are told that the men who fought there must watch
quietly while American lives are lost so that we can exercise the incredible arrogance of
Vietnamizing the Vietnamese. Each day to facilitate the process by which the United States
washes her hands of Vietnam someone has to give up his life so that the United States
doesn't have to admit something that the entire world already knows, so that we can't say
that we have made a mistake. Someone has to die so that President Nixon won't be, and
these are his words, "the first President to lose a war." We are asking
Americans to think about that because how do you ask a man to be the last man to die in
Vietnam? How do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?....We are here in
Washington to say that the problem of this war is not just a question of war and
diplomacy. It is part and parcel of everything that we are trying as human beings to
communicate to people in this country - the question of racism which is rampant in the
military, and so many other questions such as the use of weapons; the hypocrisy in our
taking umbrage at the Geneva Conventions and using that as justification for a
continuation of this war when we are more guilty than any other body of violations of
those Geneva Conventions; in the use of free fire zones, harassment interdiction fire,
search and destroy missions, the bombings, the torture of prisoners, all accepted policy
by many units in South Vietnam. That is what we are trying to say. It is part and parcel
of everything. An American Indian friend of mine who lives in the Indian Nation of
Alcatraz put it to me very succinctly. He told me how as a boy on an Indian reservation he
had watched television and he used to cheer the cowboys when they came in and shot the
Indians, and then suddenly one day he stopped in Vietnam and he said, "my God, I am
doing to these people the very same thing that was done to my people," and he
stopped. And that is what we are trying to say, that we think this thing has to end. We
are here to ask, and we are here to ask vehemently, where are the leaders of our country?
Where is the leadership? We're here to ask where are McNamara, Rostow, Bundy, Gilpatrick,
and so many others? Where are they now that we, the men they sent off to war, have
returned? These are the commanders who have deserted their troops. And there is no more
serious crime in the laws of war. The Army says they never leave their wounded. The
marines say they never even leave their dead. These men have left all the casualties and
retreated behind a pious shield of public rectitude. They've left the real stuff of their
reputations bleaching behind them in the sun in this country.... We wish that a merciful
God could wipe away our own memories of that service as easily as this administration has
wiped away their memories of us. But all that they have done and all that they can do by
this denial is to make more clear than ever our own determination to undertake one last
mission - to search out and destroy the last vestige of this barbaric war, to pacify our
own hearts, to conquer the hate and fear that have driven this country these last ten
years and more. And more. And so when thirty years from now our brothers go down the
street without a leg, without an arm, or a face, and small boys ask why, we will be able
to say "Vietnam" and not mean a desert, not a filthy obscene memory, but mean
instead where America finally turned and where soldiers like us helped it in the turning.
Vietnam Veterans Against the War
Presented at a
meeting of the Student Assembly of Columbia University Student Assembly, July 23, 1971
Vietnam is something you have to experience firsthand to
believe. I know I didn't believe what anybody told me about Vietnam before I went; it was
something I had to go through myself.
Let me go back and tell you who I am and what I'm about.
I'm a retired first lieutenant in the Marines -- retired, because today, when you're
separated from service for a disability, you're put on a retired basis; you're not simply
discharged as you were in World War II. [Mr. Muller spoke from a wheelchair, the result of
a crippling injury sustained in Vietnam.]
In 1967, I was in my senior year in college at Hofstra
University. And one day that spring, I went into the Student Union Building, and there was
a Marine officer standing there. He looked very sharp: he had his dress blues on, and he
had the old crimson stripe down the side of his trousers. I said, "That looks good!
I'm going to be a marine."
Right there, in that sentence, is really the tragedy of
my life, as I view it. The tragedy of my life was not being shot in Vietnam; the tragedy
in my life is one that has been shared by all too many Americans, and is still being
shared today. For me, knowledge of the fact that my government had seen fit to involve us
militarily in Vietnam was sufficient for me. I never asked the reason why. I just
took it on blind faith that my government knew a hell of a lot more than I ever could, and
that they must be right. My opinion has changed since then....
Still the fact is, I went. I went all the way, with no
reservation. I said, "If you're going to fight, you might as well go all the
way." So I joined the Marines, and then became an officer. I didn't request the
infantry, and I didn't request to go to Vietnam; I literally demanded it. I was "the
Marine's Marine:" I could run faster, do more push-ups and more pull-ups. I had
leadership capability and so on and so forth. I got what I was after.
When I was in the Marine Corps, as I said before, I never
really asked "Why are we in Vietnam? What's the history behind our involvement
in that country?" I went in -- boom! There's something you have to understand about a
system like the military: once you become a part of the machinery, it works on you. By the
time it came time for me to go overseas, I was a fanatic; I was the epitome of John Wayne;
I wanted but one thing: I wanted to kill.
You go through this environment of the military, and
everything sort of works on itself. Your instructors, the guys you're going through with,
your peers, what have you -- all the time it's an indoctrination. "We're out there,
and we're fighting the `gooks.'" You get a couple of hundred guys out in the field,
and they put the old bayonet on the rifle. "Kill, kill." Who do you kill?
"Luke the Gook" and "Link the Chink." You get psyched up on this
I was "Gung-Ho" as they say. And I went to
Vietnam with this in mind: here is a country, South Vietnam, that is a freedom-loving
people, that want their independence, their right to self-determination, and they are
being subjected to a massive Communist invasion from the North. I had some close family
friends who were fairly high in the military; they had gone to Vietnam, and their
experiences sort of backed up what I was being told: that we were fighting to repel an
invasion of these freedom-loving people from the North. I said, "Wow! That don't go!
I'm for the liberation of anybody who wants to be free."
We get small-arms fire from a village, we get a sniper,
and do you know how we return that small-arms fire? We return it with anything --
and that goes from whatever's organic to the unit you're working with -- your mortars, for
example -- to heavy artillery, to gunships to jets, to napalm, to big bombs, even Naval
gunfire; we had the battleship New Jersey on station with the sixteen-inch guns. We'd come
across villages where we'd take fire, and for the one or two people in there that might be
V.C., we'd level that village. Now militarily, that might make sense; but you just stop
and think for a minutes what it means when, to get two people, you kill 150.
Is My Lai an isolated incident? Hell, no! It may not have
happened so often that one platoon commander, in an immediate situation, rounds up people
as Calley did, and just summarily executies them. Granted, I had the same experiences
Calley had. I had had guys in my platoon that were blown away by kids. We had a company
set-up outside a village, and during the day, kids came by. And the guys were giving them
C-rations and chocolate and they took them into the perimeter. And they were giving them
cigarettes, what have you, and being real nice. And the kids were ten years old, eleven
years old. They were manning the water-buffalo. I said, "Don't let the kids in the
perimeter." That night the company got hit by a VC mortar and rocket squad, and they
had our positions mapped out. They knew where the CP was, they knew where all our
defensive positions were, and how they got the information was from the kids. And yes, you
do have, among the kids, among the women, VC sympathizers. That's the majority of what I
came into contact with, anyway, in Northern I-Corps. But because you have people who are
VC sympathizers mixed in with the population what's the solution? What have we done in
Vietnam? Actually follow a policy of genocide? And it is genocide, because of the nature
of the war. It's not a conventional war; it's not the same as World War II, it's not the
same as Korea. We don't have fronts, we don't acquire land, hold it, and then move on and
acquire more land. What we do is, try to win the minds of the people; and since we're
doomed to fail, there's only one other answer: liquidate them. And that is what we've
I have a friend who spent four years in Laos. Don't try
to tell him what we're doing in Laos is winding down the war; that's hogwash. He can tell
you about day after day after day in Laos -- a country that we're not even at war with --
where our guys are going over and not limiting themselves to the Ho Chi Minh trail, but
are going throughout the entire region of populated areas, and knocking out the villages.
These stories about people living in caves and tunnels; that's no joke; it's reality. It's
what's going on.
Perhaps you think I'm just a bitter person -- and only
because I got hit in Nam. I am bitter. You're damn straight I'm bitter! There is no way I
could give you the essence of what I'm talking about. I could sit here all night, and tell
you a series of war stories. A lot of them would really make your hair stand on end -- but
I'm not going to do that. You had that with the film ("Winter Soldiers").
They say that because we Vietnam veterans are called upon
to kill, we're dehumanized, we are callous. I will agree with that statement and disagree
with it, too. While I was in Vietnam, and a combatant, I was very callous. One time I had
the guy on the right and the guy on the left of me both get hit, and I didn't blink an
eye; it wasn't me; I didn't get hit, they did. They might have been my friends, but
it wasn't my ass that got blown away. As I said before, kill another person? You do it.
You're in that situation and you're going to kill.
But there's something even more to the fanaticism that
led me. After I made up my mind that the war was wrong, I still fought. The last day I was
in Vietnam, the day I got shot, I knew the war was wrong; but I still went up that hill,
assaulting North Vietnamese positions, with only one idea in my head, and that was to kill
-- not for any ideological reason, but simply out of hatred. I'd lost friends in Nam, I'd
gone through hell for eight months, these guys were the enemy to me, and I went out to
You might say I got caught up in an insanity. It's very
simple back here in the States to pass judgment on what goes on in the heads of the guys
in Vietnam. It's very easy for somebody to say, "How the hell can these things
happen, that the guys are talking about? These guys should all be thrown in jail!"
It's very easy to just be here and say, "What a barbaric act!" But that's the
kind of war this is.
Vietnam is ten thousand miles away to you people. I don't
want to sound condescending, but it's a reality! It's going on today! Right now, there are
guys out on ambushes, there are guys on "long-range reconnaissance inserts," in
Laos, in Cambodia. The killing is going on right now! The psychological pressures that are
in these guys' heads is going on right now. Don't let this statistic of "eleven
deaths last week" throw you. There is a full-fledged war going on, with all the
horrors that go along with it. If you don't physically see the horrors of war, it's easy
to forget. It's easy to forget it. Maybe it's something you try to forget.
But, dammit, I can't. It's with me every day, whether I
like it or not, I cannot forget what is going on in Vietnam. Everybody in this country
seems to be thinking, "The War's over. They're going to work out some great plan.
They're going to have a withdrawal of troops. Fine and dandy!" But that war is still
going on. And until it's politically expedient for Nixon to get a withdrawal out of
Vietnam, and a negotiated settlement, how many more guys are going to have to die? And
again, I'm not only talking about Americans.
There are a lot of things about Vietnamization, but the
tragedy of it is this: that it continues the war. Now you can sugar-coat the rest of it
any way you want to: "We're not doing the fighting anymore. We're only giving them
air support." But the fighting continues! And if it's not obvious now -- after how
long we've been there, after having over half a million American men totally committed to
trying to seek a military victory -- that this war cannot be won militarily, short of the
deployment of tactical nuclear weapons -- then I don't know when it will be. But if you
consider wiping out North Vietnam a victory, and rubbing out major sections of South
Vietnam a victory, then I say, "Well, that's your definition; to me, that's no
Vietnam did something to me, it shook me out of the rut
in my life. There's this whole thing about the Pentagon Papers and the need to make
yourself knowledgeable. This is the essence of what I try and say -- specifically when I
talk with high school students. But I don't limit it to that.
I was going on with blinkers through my whole life. I
graduated from college with a very high average. You'd think I was intelligent; I was a
dummy. I was all set to go into the Marines, spend three yeas as an officer, get the
leadership credentials and all that garbage; come back and go into a major corporation, in
its management training program, right up the scale, and so on and so forth. Vietnam
pointed something out to me, that I was derelict, I was negligent in my responsibility as
a citizen. I don't mean delegating all my responsibilities as a citizen to whoever I voted
for, or whoever was my congressman or senator. All right, they're the ones who are making
the policy; who am I? I'm Norman Nobody. "Even if I know something, what good is it
going to do?" I think it can do some good. I say that there is going to be a
revolution in this country. And it won't be born out of violence or bloodshed.
The revolution I'm talking about may be one reason why
you're here tonight: an increased sensitivity on your part, a greater awareness of your
function as a human being, and of your responsibility, as a citizen of this country, to be
held accountable for, and to try to direct, what the United States of American is doing in
your name. That's the revolution I'm talking about -- a social revolution, a change
in thinking, one that says, "Throw out `kill ratios' as the logic for continuing the
war." Our commanders are happy; they say, "We will continue. We're winning in
Vietnam, because we are getting fifteen `gooks' for every American killed." It is
that I want to see a total rejection of. I want to see people recognize that a Laotian, a
Cambodian, a North Vietnamese, a Viet Cong, has got as much right to live -- and live any
way he chooses to -- as any American. The day that we really incorporate that into our
thinking is the day that we're going to change.
You ask me, "What can I do for peace?" I don't
know. I've seen a lot of suffering, and I'm aware because I saw it. I hope you can become
aware, because then you will take on your responsibility as a citizen to know what we've
done in Vietnam, and to broaden our horizons. Look at what's going on in Pakistan, with
this Administration still wanting to send military aid to Pakistan, where hundreds of
thousands of Bengalis have been slaughtered. This is what I'm talking about, this
sensitivity. Look at us supporting a military hunta in Greece, in Athens, or having Spiro
T. [Agnew, the Vice President under Richard Nixon] going around to all these fascist
countries, saying "Right on! Right on!" That's what I oppose. And that's why I
say, "Open up your heads and be aware."
Be aware of the racist policy that we have followed. I
hardly even touched the racist nature of [the war in] Vietnam, but it's there. I can go on
and on and on. But the whole thing winds down to this: I've seen a lot of hate in this
world; and all I have left -- all I try to keep in my head and convey to others -- is
love. And I mean that, because that is all I've got left. Thank you.
Source: The Fight for the Right to Know the
Truth: A Study of the War in S.E. Asia through the Pentagon Papers and Other Sources
(monograph). New York: The Student Assembly of Columbia University, 1971.
This text, made available by the Sixties Project, is
copyright (c)1993 by the Author or by Viet Nam Generation, Inc., all rights reserved.
This text may be used, printed, and archived in accordance with the Fair Use provisions of
U.S. Copyright law. This text may not be archived, printed, or redistributed in any form
for a fee, without the consent of the copyright holder. This notice must accompany any
redistribution of the text. The Sixties Project, sponsored by Viet Nam Generation Inc. and
the Institute of Advanced Technology in
the Humanities at the University of Virginia at Charlottesville, is a collective of
humanities scholars working together on the Internet to use electronic resources to
provide routes of collaboration and make available primary and secondary sources for
researchers, students, teachers, writers and librarians interested in the 1960s.
Letter from President Nixon
to President Thieu
January 5, 1973
Dear Mr. President:
This will acknowledge your letter of
December 20, 1972.
There is nothing substantial that I can add
to my many previous messages, including my December 17 letter, which clearly stated my
opinions and intentions. With respect to the question of North Vietnamese troops, we will
again present your views to the Communists as we have done vigorously at every ether
opportunity in the negotiations. The result is certain to be once more the rejection of
our position. We have explained to you repeatedly why we believe the problem of North
Vietnamese troops is manageable under the agreement, and I see no reason to repeat all the
We will proceed next week in Paris along the
lines that General Haig explained to you. Accordingly, if the North Vietnamese meet our
concerns on the two outstanding substantive issues in the agreement, concerning the DMZ
and type method of signing and if we can arrange acceptable supervisory machinery, we will
proceed to conclude the settlement. The gravest consequence would then ensue if your
government chose to reject the agreement and split off from the United States. As I said
in my December 17 letter, "I am convinced that your refusal to join us would be an
invitation to disaster - to the loss of all that we together have fought for over the past
decade. It would be inexcusable above all because we will have lost a just and honorable
As we enter this new round of talks, I hope
that our countries will now show a united front. It is imperative for our common
objectives that your government take no further actions that complicate our task and would
make more difficult the acceptance of the settlement by all parties. We will keep you
informed of the negotiations in Paris through daily briefings of Ambassador (Pham Dang)
I can only repeat what I have so often said:
The best guarantee for the survival of South Vietnam is the unity of our two countries
which would be gravely jeopardized if you persist in your present course. The actions of
our Congress since its return have clearly borne out the many warnings we have made.
Should you decide, as I trust you will, to
go with us, you have my assurance of continued assistance in the post-settlement period
and that we will respond with full force should the settlement be violated by North
Vietnam. So once more I conclude with an appeal to you to close ranks with us.
JANUARY 20, 1973
Mr. Vice President, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Chief Justice,
Senator Cook, Mrs. Eisenhower, and my fellow citizens of this great and good country we
When we met here four years ago, America was bleak in
spirit, depressed by the prospect of seemingly endless war abroad and of destructive
conflict at home.
As we meet here today, we stand on the threshold of a new
era of peace in the world.
The central question before us is: How shall we use that
peace? Let us resolve that this era we are about to enter will not be what other postwar
periods have so often been: a time of retreat and isolation that leads to stagnation at
home and invites new danger abroad.
Let us resolve that this will be what it can become: a
time of great responsibilities greatly borne, in which we renew the spirit and the promise
of America as we enter our third century as a nation.
This past year saw far-reaching results from our new
policies for peace. By continuing to revitalize our traditional friendships, and by our
missions to Peking and to Moscow, we were able to establish the base for a new and more
durable pattern of relationships among the nations of the world. Because of America's bold
initiatives, 1972 will be long remembered as the year of the greatest progress since the
end of World War II toward a lasting peace in the world.
The peace we seek in the world is not the flimsy peace
which is merely an interlude between wars, but a peace which can endure for generations to
It is important that we understand both the necessity and
the limitations of America's role in maintaining that peace.
Unless we in America work to preserve the peace, there
will be no peace.
Unless we in America work to preserve freedom, there will
be no freedom.
But let us clearly understand the new nature of America's
role, as a result of the new policies we have adopted over these past four years.
We shall respect our treaty commitments.
We shall support vigorously the principle that no country
has the right to impose its will or rule on another by force.
We shall continue, in this era of negotiation, to work
for the limitation of nuclear arms, and to reduce the danger of confrontation between the
We shall do our share in defending peace and freedom in
the world. But we shall expect others to do their share.
The time has passed when America will make every other
nation's conflict our own, or make every other nation's future our responsibility, or
presume to tell the people of other nations how to manage their own affairs.
Just as we respect the right of each nation to determine
its own future, we also recognize the responsibility of each nation to secure its own
Just as America's role is indispensable in preserving the
world's peace, so is each nation's role indispensable in preserving its own peace.
Together with the rest of the world, let us resolve to
move forward from the beginnings we have made. Let us continue to bring down the walls of
hostility which have divided the world for too long, and to build in their place bridges
of understanding--so that despite profound differences between systems of government, the
people of the world can be friends.
Let us build a structure of peace in the world in which
the weak are as safe as the strong--in which each respects the right of the other to live
by a different system--in which those who would influence others will do so by the
strength of their ideas, and not by the force of their arms.
Let us accept that high responsibility not as a burden,
but gladly--gladly because the chance to build such a peace is the noblest endeavor in
which a nation can engage; gladly, also, because only if we act greatly in meeting our
responsibilities abroad will we remain a great Nation, and only if we remain a great
Nation will we act greatly in meeting our challenges at home.
We have the chance today to do more than ever before in
our history to make life better in America--to ensure better education, better health,
better housing, better transportation, a cleaner environment--to restore respect for law,
to make our communities more livable--and to insure the God-given right of every American
to full and equal opportunity.
Because the range of our needs is so great--because the
reach of our opportunities is so great--let us be bold in our determination to meet those
needs in new ways.
Just as building a structure of peace abroad has required
turning away from old policies that failed, so building a new era of progress at home
requires turning away from old policies that have failed.
Abroad, the shift from old policies to new has not been a
retreat from our responsibilities, but a better way to peace.
And at home, the shift from old policies to new will not
be a retreat from our responsibilities, but a better way to progress.
Abroad and at home, the key to those new responsibilities
lies in the placing and the division of responsibility. We have lived too long with the
consequences of attempting to gather all power and responsibility in Washington.
Abroad and at home, the time has come to turn away from
the condescending policies of paternalism--of "Washington knows best."
A person can be expected to act responsibly only if he
has responsibility. This is human nature. So let us encourage individuals at home and
nations abroad to do more for themselves, to decide more for themselves. Let us locate
responsibility in more places. Let us measure what we will do for others by what they will
do for themselves.
That is why today I offer no promise of a purely
governmental solution for every problem. We have lived too long with that false promise.
In trusting too much in government, we have asked of it more than it can deliver. This
leads only to inflated expectations, to reduced individual effort, and to a disappointment
and frustration that erode confidence both in what government can do and in hat people can
Government must learn to take less from people so that
people an do more for themselves.
Let us remember that America was built not by government,
but by people--not by welfare, but by work--not by shirking responsibility, but by seeking
In our own lives, let each of us ask--not just what will
government do for me, but what can I do for myself?
In the challenges we face together, let each of us
ask--not just how can government help, but how can I help?
Your National Government has a great and vital role to
play. And I pledge to you that where this Government should act, we will act boldly and we
will lead boldly. But just as important is the role that each and every one of us must
play, as an individual and as a member of his own community.
From this day forward, let each of us make a solemn
commitment in his own heart: to bear his responsibility, to do his part, to live his
ideals--so that together, we can see the dawn of a new age of progress for America, and
together, as we celebrate our 200th anniversary as a nation, we can do so proud in the
fulfillment of our promise to ourselves and to the world.
As America's longest and most difficult war comes to an
end, let us again learn to debate our differences with civility and decency. And let each
of us reach out for that one precious quality government cannot provide--a new level of
respect for the rights and feelings of one another, a new level of respect for the
individual human dignity which is the cherished birthright of every American.
Above all else, the time has come for us to renew our
faith in ourselves and in America.
In recent years, that faith has been challenged.
Our children have been taught to be ashamed of their
country, ashamed of their parents, ashamed of America's record at home and of its role in
At every turn, we have been beset by those who find
everything wrong with America and little that is right. But I am confident that this will
not be the judgment of history on these remarkable times in which we are privileged to
America's record in this century has been unparalleled in
the world's history for its responsibility, for its generosity, for its creativity and for
Let us be proud that our system has produced and provided
more freedom and more abundance, more widely shared, than any other system in the history
of the world.
Let us be proud that in each of the four wars in which we
have been engaged in this century, including the one we are now bringing to an end, we
have fought not for our selfish advantage, but to help others resist aggression.
Let us be proud that by our bold, new initiatives, and by
our steadfastness for peace with honor, we have made a break-through toward creating in
the world what the world has not known before-- a structure of peace that can last, not
merely for our time, but for generations to come.
We are embarking here today on an era that presents
challenges great as those any nation, or any generation, has ever faced.
We shall answer to God, to history, and to our conscience
for the way in which we use these years.
As I stand in this place, so hallowed by history, I think
of others who have stood here before me. I think of the dreams they had for America, and I
think of how each recognized that he needed help far beyond himself in order to make those
dreams come true.
Today, I ask your prayers that in the years ahead I may
have God's help in making decisions that are right for America, and I pray for your help
so that together we may be worthy of our challenge.
Let us pledge together to make these next four years the
best four years in America's history, so that on its 200th birthday America will be as
young and as vital as when it began, and as bright a beacon of hope for all the world.
Let us go forward from here confident in hope, strong in
our faith in one another, sustained by our faith in God who created us, and striving
always to serve His purpose.
"Peace With Honor" broadcast
by President Nixon
January 23, 1973
Good evening. I have asked for this radio
and television time tonight for the purpose of announcing that we today have concluded an
agreement to end the war and bring peace with honor in Vietnam and in Southeast Asia. The
following statement is being issued at this moment in Washington and Hanoi: At 12:30 Paris
time today [Tuesday], January 23, 1973, the Agreement on Ending the War and Restoring
Peace in Vietnam was initialed by Dr. Henry Kissinger on behalf of the United States, and
Special Adviser Le Duc Tho on behalf of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam. The agreement
will be formally signed by the parties participating in the Paris Conference on Vietnam on
January 27, 1973, at the International Conference Center in Paris. The cease-fire will
take effect at 2400 Greenwich Mean Time, January 27, 1973. The United States and the
Democratic Republic of Vietnam express the hope that this agreement will insure stable
peace in Vietnam and contribute to the preservation of lasting peace in Indochina and
Southeast Asia. . That concludes the formal statement. Throughout the years of
negotiations, we have insisted on peace with honor. In my addresses to the Nation from
this room of January 25 and May 8,  I set forth the goals that we considered
essential for peace with honor. In the settlement that has now been agreed to, all the
conditions that I laid down then have been met. A cease-fire, internationally supervised,
will begin at 7 p.m., this Saturday, January 27, Washington time. Within 60 days from this
Saturday, all Americans held prisoners of war throughout Indochina will be released. There
will be the fullest possible accounting for all of those who are missing in action. During
the same 60-day period, all American forces will be withdrawn from South Vietnam. The
people of South Vietnam have been guaranteed the right to determine their own future,
without outside interference. By joint agreement, the full text of the agreement and the
protocols to carry it out, will be issued tomorrow. Throughout these negotiations we have
been in the closest consultation with President Thieu and other representatives of the
Republic of Vietnam. This settlement meets the goals and has the full support of President
Thieu and the Government of the Republic of Vietnam, as well as that of our other allies
who are affected. The United States will continue to recognize the Government of the
Republic of Vietnam as the sole legitimate government of South Vietnam. We shall continue
to aid South Vietnam within the terms of the agreement and we shall support efforts by the
people of South Vietnam to settle their problems peacefully among themselves. We must
recognize that ending the war is only the first step toward building the peace. All
parties must now see to it that this is a peace that lasts, and also a peace that heals,
and a peace that not only ends the war in Southeast Asia, but contributes to the prospects
of peace in the whole world. This will mean that the terms of the agreement must be
scrupulously adhered to. We shall do everything the agreement requires of us and we shall
expect the other parties to do everything it requires of them. We shall also expect other
interested nations to help insure that the agreement is carried out and peace is
maintained. As this long and very difficult war ends, I would like to address a few
special words to each of those who have been parties in the conflict. First, to the people
and Government of South Vietnam: By your courage, by your sacrifice, you have won the
precious right to determine your own future and you have developed the strength to defend
that right. We look forward to working with you in the future, friends in peace as we have
been allies in war. To the leaders of North Vietnam: As we have ended the war through
negotiations, let us now build a peace of reconciliation. For our part; we are prepared to
make a major effort to help achieve that goal. But just as reciprocity was needed to end
the war, so, too, will it be needed to build and strengthen the peace. To the other major
powers that have been involved even indirectly: Now is the time for mutual restraint so
that the peace we have achieved can last. And finally, to all of you who are listening,
the American people: Your steadfastness in supporting our insistence on peace with honor
has made peace with honor possible. I know that you would not have wanted that peace
jeopardized. With our secret negotiations at the sensitive stage they were in during this
recent period, for me to have discussed publicly our efforts to secure peace would not
only have violated our understanding with North Vietnam, it would have seriously harmed
and possibly destroyed the chances for peace. Therefore, I know that you now can
understand why, during these past several weeks, I have not made any public statements
about those efforts. The important thing was not to talk about peace, but to get peace and
to get the right kind of peace. This we have done. Now that we have achieved an honorable
agreement, let us be proud that America did not settle for a peace that would have
betrayed our allies, that would have abandoned our prisoners of war, or that would have
ended the war for us but would have continued the war for the 50 million people of
Indochina. Let us be proud of the 2 1/2 million young Americans who served in Vietnam, who
served with honor and distinction in one of the most selfless enterprises in the history
of nations. And let us be proud of those who sacrificed, who gave their lives so that the
people of South Vietnam might live in freedom and so that the world might live in peace.
In particular, I would like to say a word to some of the bravest people I have ever
met-the wives, the children, the families of our prisoners of war and the missing in
action. When others called on us to settle on any terms, you had the courage to stand for
the right kind of peace so that those who died and those who suffered would not have died
and suffered in vain, and so that, where this generation knew war, the next generation
would know peace. Nothing means more to me at this moment than the fact that your long
vigil is coming to an end. Just yesterday, a great American, who once occupied this
office, died. In his life President [Lyndon B.] Johnson endured the vilification of those
who sought to portray him as a man of war. But there was nothing he cared about more
deeply than achieving a lasting peace in the world. I remember the last time I talked with
him. It was just the day after New Year's. He spoke then of his concern with bringing
peace, with making it the right kind of peace, and I was grateful that he once again
expressed his support for my efforts to gain such a peace. No one would have welcomed this
peace more than he. And I know he would join me in asking for those who died and for those
who live, let us consecrate this moment by resolving together to make the peace we have
achieved a peace that will last. Thank you and good evening.
Excerpts from the Paris Accords
January 27, 1973
.... The United States and all other countries respect
the independence, sovereignty, unity, and territorial integrity of Viet-Nam as recognized
by the 1954 Geneva Agreements on Viet-Nam . . .
A cease fire shall be observed throughout South Viet-Nam
as of 2400 hours G.M.T., on January 27, 1973. At the same hour, the United States will
stop all its military activities against the territory of the Democratic Republic of
Viet-Nam by ground, air and naval forces, wherever they may be based, and end the mining
of the territorial waters, ports, harbors, and waterways of the Democratic Republic of
Viet-Nam. The United States will remove, permanently deactivate or destroy all the mines
in the territorial waters, ports, harbors, and waterways of North Viet-Nam as soon as this
Agreement goes into effect. The complete cessation of hostilities mentioned in this
Article shall be durable and without limit of time....
The United States will not continue its military
involvement or intervene in the internal affairs of South Viet-Nam.
Within sixty days of the signing of this Agreement, there
will be a total withdrawal from South Viet-Nam of troops, military advisers, and military
personnel including technical military personnel and military personnel associated with
the pacification program, armaments, munitions, and war material of the United States and
those of the other foreign countries mentioned in Article 3(a). Advisers from the
above-mentioned countries to all paramilitary organizations and the police force will also
be withdrawn within the same period of time.
The dismantlement of all military bases in South Viet-Nam
of the United States and of the other foreign countries mentioned in Article 3(a) shall be
completed within sixty days of the signing of this Agreement.
From the enforcement of the cease-fire to the formation
of the government provided for in Article 9(b) and 14 of this Agreement, the two South
Vietnamese parties shall not accept the introduction of troops, military advisers, and
military personnel including technical military personnel, armaments, munitions, and war
material into South Viet-Nam....
(a) The return of captured military personnel and
foreign civilians of the parties shall be carried out simultaneously with and completed
not later than the same day as the troop withdrawal mentioned in Article 5. The parties
shall exchange complete lists of the above-mentioned captured military personnel and
foreign civilians on the day of the signing of this Agreement.
(b) The Parties shall help each other to get
information about those military personnel and foreign civilians of the parties missing in
action, to determine the location and take care of the graves of the dead so as to
facilitate the exhumation and repatriation of the remains, and to take any such other
measures as may be required to get information about those still considered missing in
(c) The question of the return of Vietnamese
civilian personnel captured and detained in South Viet-Nam will be resolved by the two
South Vietnamese parties on the basis of the principles of Article 21(b) of the Agreement
on the Cessation of Hostilities in Viet-Nam of July 20, 1954. The two South Vietnamese
parties will do so in a spirit of national reconciliation and concord, with a view to
ending hatred and enmity, in order to ease suffering and to reunite families. The two
South Vietnamese parties will do their utmost to resolve this question within ninety days
after the cease-fire comes into effect....
Immediately after the cease-fire, the two South
Vietnamese parties will: -achieve national reconciliation and concord, end hatred and
enmity, prohibit all acts of reprisal and discrimination against individuals or
organizations that have collaborated with one side or the other; -ensure the democratic
liberties of the people: personal freedom, freedom of speech, freedom of the press,
freedom of meeting, freedom of organization, freedom of political activities, freedom of
belief, freedom of movement, freedom of residence, freedom of work, right to property
ownership, and right to free enterprise....
Chapter V The
Reunification of Viet-Nam and The Relationship Between North and South Viet-Nam
The reunification of Viet-Nam shall be carried out step
by step through peaceful means on the basis of discussions and agreements between North
and South Viet-Nam, without coercion or annexation by either party, and without foreign
interference. The time for reunification will be agreed upon by North and South Viet-Nam.
(a)The military demarcation line between the two
zones at the 17th parallel is only provisional and not a political or territorial
boundary, as provided for in paragraph 6 of the Final Declaration of the 1954 Geneva
(b)North and South Viet-Nam shall respect the
Demilitarized Zone on either side of the Provisional Military Demarcation Line.
(c) North and South Viet-Nam shall promptly start
negotiations with a view to reestablishing normal relations in various fields. Among the
questions to be negotiated are the modalities of civilian movement across the Provisional
Military Demarcation Line.
(d) North and South Viet-Nam shall not join any
military alliance or military bloc and shall not allow foreign powers to maintain military
bases, troops, military advisers, and military personnel on their respective territories,
as stipulated in the 1954 Geneva Agreements on Viet-Nam....
The United States anticipates that this Agreement will
usher in an era of reconciliation with the Democratic Republic of Viet-Nam as with all the
peoples of Indochina. In pursuance of its traditional policy, the United States will
contribute to healing the wounds of war and to postwar reconstruction of the Democratic
Republic of Viet-Nam and throughout Indochina.
The ending of the war, the restoration of peace in
Viet-Nam, and the strict implementation of this Agreement will create conditions for
establishing a new, equal and mutually beneficial relationship between the United States
and the Democratic Republic of Viet-Nam on the basis of respect of each other's
independence and sovereignty, and non-interference in each other's internal affairs. At
the same time this will ensure stable peace in Viet-Nam and contribute to the preservation
of lasting peace in Indochina and Southeast Asia....
The Return of Captured
Military Personnel and Foreign Civilians
The parties signatory to the Agreement shall return the
captured military personnel of the parties mentioned in Article 8(a) of the Agreement as
follows: -all captured military personnel of the United States and those of the other
foreign countries mentioned in Article 3(a) of the Agreement shall be returned to United
States authorities; -all captured Vietnamese military personnel, whether belonging to
regular or irregular armed forces, shall be returned to the two South Vietnamese parties;
they shall be returned to that South Vietnamese party under whose command they served.
All captured civilians who are nationals of the United
States or of any other foreign countries mentioned in Article 3(a) of the Agreement shall
be returned to United States authorities. All other captured foreign civilians shall be
returned to the authorities of their country of nationality by any one of the parties
willing and able to do so.
The parties shall today exchange complete lists of
captured persons mentioned in Articles 1 and 2 of this Protocol.
(a) The return of all captured persons mentioned in
Articles 1 and 2 of this Protocol shall be completed within sixty days of the signing of
the Agreement at a rate no slower than the rate of withdrawal from South Viet-Nam of
United States forces and those of the other foreign countries mentioned in Article 5 of
(b) Persons who are seriously ill, wounded or maimed, old
persons and women shall be returned first. The remainder shall be returned either by
returning all from one detention place after another or in order of their dates of
capture, beginning with those who have been held the longest....
With Regard to Dead and
(a) The Four-Party Joint Military Commission shall ensure
joint action by the parties in implementing Article 8 (b) of the Agreement. When the
Four-Party Joint Military Commission has ended its activities, a Four-Party Joint Military
team shall be maintained to carry on this task.
(b) With regard to Vietnamese civilian personnel dead or
missing in South Viet-Nam, the two South Vietnamese parties shall help each other to
obtain information about missing persons, determine the location and take care of the
graves of the dead, in a spirit of national reconciliation and concord, in keeping with
the people's aspirations....
War Powers Resolution
President Nixon a stunning setback when it voted to override his veto of legislation
limiting presidential powers to commit US forces abroad without congressional approval.
Congress, with the Vietnam War and the showdown over continued bombing in Cambodia
behind it, was anxious to reassert its role in the conduct of the country's foreign affairs.
Public Law 93-148
93rd Congress, H. J. Res. 542
November 7, 1973
Concerning the War Powers of Congress and the President.
Resolved by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States of America in
SECTION 1. This joint resolution may be cited as the "War Powers Resolution".
PURPOSE AND POLICY
SEC. 2. (a) It is the purpose of this joint resolution to fulfill the intent of the
framers of the Constitution of the United States and insure that the collective
of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States
Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in
hostilities is clearly indicate by the circumstances, and to the continued use of such
forces in hostilities or in such situations.
(b) Under article I, section 8, of the Constitution, it is specifically provided that the
Congress shall have the power to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into
execution, not only its own powers but also all other powers vested by the Constitution in
the Government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.
(c) The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United
States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in
hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1)
a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency
created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed
SEC. 3. The President in every possible instance shall consult with Congress before
introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situation where imminent
involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and after every such
introduction shall consult regularly with the Congress until United States Armed Forces
are no longer engaged in hostilities or have been removed from such situations.
SEC. 4. (a) In the absence of a declaration of war, in any case in which United States
Armed Forces are introduced--
(1) into hostilities or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is
clearly indicated by the circumstances;
(2) into the territory, airspace or waters of a foreign nation, while equipped for combat,
except for deployments which relate solely to supply, replacement, repair, or training of
such forces; or
(3) in numbers which substantially enlarge United States Armed Forces equipped for combat
already located in a foreign nation; the president shall submit within 48 hours to the
Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the President pro tempore of the Senate a
report, in writing, setting forth--
(A) the circumstances necessitating the introduction of United States Armed Forces;
(B) the constitutional and legislative authority under which such introduction took place;
(C) the estimated scope and duration of the hostilities or involvement.
(b) The President shall provide such other information as the Congress may request in the
fulfillment of its constitutional responsibilities with respect to committing the Nation
to war and to the use of United States Armed Forces abroad
(c) Whenever United States Armed Forces are introduced into hostilities or into any
situation described in subsection (a) of this section, the President shall, so long as
such armed forces continue to be engaged in such hostilities or situation, report to the
Congress periodically on the status of such hostilities or situation as well as on the
scope and duration of such hostilities or situation, but in no event shall he report to
the Congress less often than once every six months.
SEC. 5. (a) Each report submitted pursuant to section 4(a)(1) shall be transmitted to the
Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the President pro tempore of the Senate on
the same calendar day. Each report so transmitted shall be referred to the Committee on
Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Foreign Relations
of the Senate for appropriate action. If, when the report is transmitted, the Congress has
adjourned sine die or has adjourned for any period in excess of three calendar days, the
Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate, if
they deem it advisable (or if petitioned by at least 30 percent of the membership of their
respective Houses) shall jointly request the President to convene Congress in order that
it may consider the report and take appropriate action pursuant to this section.
(b) Within sixty calendar days after a report is submitted or is required to be submitted
pursuant to section 4(a)(1), whichever is earlier, the President shall terminate any use
of Untied States Armed Forces with respect to which such report was submitted (or required
to be submitted), unless the Congress (1) has declared war or has enacted a specific
authorization for such use of United States Armed Forces, (2) has extended by law such
sixty-day period, or (3) is physically unable to meet as a result of an armed attack upon
the United States. Such sixty-day period shall be extended for not more than an additional
thirty days if the President determines and certifies to the Congress in writing that
unavoidable military necessity respecting the safety of United States Armed Forces
requires the continued use of such armed forces in the course of bringing about a prompt
removal of such forces.
(c) Notwithstanding subsection (b), at any time that United States Armed Forces are
engaged in hostilities outside the territory of the United States, its possessions and
territories without a declaration of war or specific statutory authorization, such forces
shall be removed by the President if the Congress so directs by concurrent resolution.
CONGRESSIONAL PRIORITY PROCEDURES FOR JOINT RESOLUTION OR BILL
SEC. 6. (a) Any joint resolution or bill introduced pursuant to section 5(b) at least
thirty calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in such
section shall be referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives or the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, as the case may be,
and such committee shall report one such joint resolution or bill, together with its
recommendations, not later than twenty-four calendar days before the expiration of the
sixty-day period specified in such section, unless such House shall otherwise determine by
the yeas and nays.
(b) Any joint resolution or bill so reported shall become the pending business of the
House in question (in the case of the Senate the time for debate shall be equally divided
between the proponents and the opponents), and shall be voted on within three calendar
days thereafter, unless such House shall otherwise determine by yeas and nays.
(c) Such a joint resolution or bill passed by one House shall be referred to the committee
of the other House named in subsection (a) and shall be reported out not later than
fourteen calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in section
5(b). The joint resolution or bill so reported shall become the pending business of the
House in question and shall be voted on within three calendar days after it has been
reported, unless such House shall otherwise determine by yeas and nays.
(d) In the case of any disagreement between the two Houses of Congress with respect to a
joint resolution or bill passed by both Houses, conferees shall be promptly appointed and
the committee of conference shall make and file a report with respect to such resolution
or bill not later than four calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period
specified in section 5(b). In the event the conferees are unable to agree within 48 hours,
they shall report back to their respective Houses in disagreement. Notwithstanding any
rule in either House concerning the printing of conference reports in the Record or
concerning any delay in the consideration of such reports, such report shall be acted on
by both Houses not later than the expiration of such sixty-day period.
CONGRESSIONAL PRIORITY PROCEDURES FOR CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
SEC. 7. (a) Any concurrent resolution introduced pursuant to section 5(b) at least thirty
calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in such section
shall be referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives or
the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, as the case may be, and one such
concurrent resolution shall be reported out by such committee together with its
recommendations within fifteen calendar days, unless such House shall otherwise determine
by the yeas and nays.
(b) Any concurrent resolution so reported shall become the pending business of the House
in question (in the case of the Senate the time for debate shall be equally divided
between the proponents and the opponents), and shall be voted on within three calendar
days thereafter, unless such House shall otherwise determine by yeas and nays.
(c) Such a concurrent resolution passed by one House shall be referred to the committee of
the other House named in subsection (a) and shall be reported out by such committee
together with its recommendations within fifteen calendar days and shall thereupon become
the pending business of such House and shall be voted on within three calendar days after
it has been reported, unless such House shall otherwise determine by yeas and nays.
(d) In the case of any disagreement between the two Houses of Congress with respect to a
concurrent resolution passed by both Houses, conferees shall be promptly appointed and the
committee of conference shall make and file a report with respect to such concurrent
resolution within six calendar days after the legislation is referred to the committee of
conference. Notwithstanding any rule in either House concerning the printing of conference
reports in the Record or concerning any delay in the consideration of such reports, such
report shall be acted on by both Houses not later than six calendar days after the
conference report is filed. In the event the conferees are unable to agree within 48
hours, they shall report back to their respective Houses in disagreement.
INTERPRETATION OF JOINT RESOLUTION
SEC. 8. (a) Authority to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into
situations wherein involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances
shall not be inferred--
(1) from any provision of law (whether or not in effect before the date of the enactment
of this joint resolution), including any provision contained in any appropriation Act,
unless such provision specifically authorizes the introduction of United States Armed
Forces into hostilities or into such situations and stating that it is intended to
constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of this joint resolution;
(2) from any treaty heretofore or hereafter ratified unless such treaty is implemented by
legislation specifically authorizing the introduction of United States Armed Forces into
hostilities or into such situations and stating that it is intended to constitute specific
statutory authorization within the meaning of this joint resolution.
(b) Nothing in this joint resolution shall be construed to require any further specific
statutory authorization to permit members of United States Armed Forces to participate
jointly with members of the armed forces of one or more foreign countries in the
headquarters operations of high-level military commands which were established prior to
the date of enactment of this joint resolution and pursuant to the United Nations Charter
or any treaty ratified by the United States prior to such date.
(c) For purposes of this joint resolution, the term "introduction of United States
Armed Forces" includes the assignment of member of such armed forces to command,
coordinate, participate in the movement of, or accompany the regular or irregular military
forces of any foreign country or government when such military forces are engaged, or
there exists an imminent threat that such forces will become engaged, in hostilities.
(d) Nothing in this joint resolution--
(1) is intended to alter the constitutional authority of the Congress or of the President,
or the provision of existing treaties; or
(2) shall be construed as granting any authority to the President with respect to the
introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situations wherein
involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances which authority he
would not have had in the absence of this joint resolution.
SEC. 9. If any provision of this joint resolution or the application thereof to any person
or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the joint resolution and the application
of such provision to any other person or circumstance shall not be affected thereby.
SEC. 10. This joint resolution shall take effect on the date of its enactment.
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
JAMES O. EASTLAND
President of the Senate pro tempore.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, U.S.,
November 7, 1973.
The House of Representatives having proceeded to reconsider the resolution (H. J. Res 542)
entitled "Joint resolution concerning the war powers of Congress and the
President", returned by the President of the United States with his objections, to
the House of Representatives, in which it originated, it was
Resolved, That the said resolution pass, two-thirds of the House of Representatives
agreeing to pass the same.
W. PAT JENNINGS
I certify that this Joint Resolution originated in the House of Representatives.
W. PAT JENNINGS
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
November 7, 1973
The Senate having proceeded to reconsider the joint resolution (H. J. Res. 542) entitled
"Joint resolution concerning the war powers of Congress and the President",
returned by the President of the United States with his objections to the House of
Representatives, in which it originate, it was
Resolved, That the said joint resolution pass, two-thirds of the Senators present having
voted in the affirmative.
FRANCIS R. VALEO
Richard M. Nixon
This is the 37th time I have spoken to you from this
office, where so many decisions have been made that shaped the history of this Nation.
Each time I have done so to discuss with you some matter than I believe affected the
In all the decisions I have made in my public life, I
have always tried to do what was best for the Nation. Throughout the long and difficult
period of Watergate, I have felt it was my duty to persevere, to make every possible
effort to complete the term of office to which you elected me.
In the past few days, however, it has become evident to
me that I no longer have a strong enough political base in the Congress to justify
continuing that effort. As long as there was such a base, I felt strongly that it was
necessary to see the constitutional process through to its conclusion, that to do
otherwise would be unfaithful to the spirit of that deliberately difficult process and a
dangerously destabilizing precedent for the future.
But with the disappearance of that base, I now believe
that the constitutional purpose has been served, and there is no longer a need for the
process to be prolonged.
I would have preferred to carry through to the finish
whatever the personal agony it would have involved, and my family unanimously urged me to
do so. But the interest of the Nation must always come before any personal considerations.
From the discussions I have had with Congressional and
other leaders, I have concluded that because of the Watergate matter I might not have the
support of the Congress that I would consider necessary to back the very difficult
decisions and carry out the duties of this office in the way the interests of the Nation
I have never been a quitter. To leave office before my
term is completed is abhorrent to every instinct in my body. But as President, I must put
the interest of America first. America needs a full-time President and a full-time
Congress, particularly at this time with problems we face at home and abroad.
To continue to fight through the months ahead for my
personal vindication would almost totally absorb the time and attention of both the
President and the Congress in a period when our entire focus should be on the great issues
of peace abroad and prosperity without inflation at home.
Therefore, I shall resign the Presidency effective at
noon tomorrow. Vice President Ford will be sworn in as President at that hour in this
As I recall the high hopes for America with which we
began this second term, I feel a great sadness that I will not be here in this office
working on your behalf to achieve those hopes in the next 2 1/2 years. But in turning over
direction of the Government to Vice President Ford, I know, as I told the Nation when I
nominated him for that office 10 months ago, that the leadership of America will be in
In passing this office to the Vice President, I also do
so with the profound sense of the weight of responsibility that will fall on his shoulders
tomorrow and, therefore, of the understanding, the patience, the cooperation he will need
from all Americans.
As he assumes that responsibility, he will deserve the
help and the support of all of us. As we look to the future, the first essential is to
begin healing the wounds of this Nation, to put the bitterness and divisions of the recent
past behind us, and to rediscover those shared ideals that lie at the heart of our
strength and unity as a great and as a free people.
By taking this action, I hope that I will have hastened
the start of that process of healing which is so desperately needed in America.
I regret deeply any injuries that may have been done in
the course of the events that led to this decision. I would say only that if some of my
judgments were wrong, and some were wrong, they were made in what I believed at the time
to be the best interest of the Nation.
To those who have stood with me during these past
difficult months, to my family, my friends, to many others who joined in supporting my
cause because they believed it was right, I will be eternally grateful for your support.
And to those who have not felt able to give me your
support, let me say I leave with no bitterness toward those who have opposed me, because
all of us, in the final analysis, have been concerned with the good of the country,
however our judgments might differ.
So, let us all now join together in affirming that common
commitment and in helping our new President succeed for the benefit of all Americans.
I shall leave this office with regret at not completing
my term, but with gratitude for the privilege of serving as your President for the past 5
1/2 years. These years have been a momentous time in the history of our Nation and the
world. They have been a time of achievement in which we can all be proud, achievements
that represent the shared efforts of the Administration, the Congress, and the people.
But the challenges ahead are equally great, and they,
too, will require the support and the efforts of the Congress and the people working in
cooperation with the new Administration.
We have ended America's longest war, but in the work of
securing a lasting peace in the world, the goals ahead are even more far-reaching and more
difficult. We must complete a structure of peace so that it will be said of this
generation, our generation of Americans, by the people of all nations, not only that we
ended one war but that we prevented future wars.
We have unlocked the doors that for a quarter of a
century stood between the United States and the People's Republic of China.
We must now ensure that the one quarter of the world's
people who live in the People's Republic of China will be and remain not our enemies but
In the Middle East, 100 million people in the Arab
countries, many of whom have considered us their enemy for nearly 20 years, now look on us
as their friends. We must continue to build on that friendship so that peace can settle at
last over the Middle East and so that the cradle of civilization will not become its
Together with the Soviet Union we have made the crucial
breakthroughs that have begun the process of limiting nuclear arms. But we must set as our
goal not just limiting but reducing and finally destroying these terrible weapons so that
they cannot destroy civilization and so that the threat of nuclear war will no longer hang
over the world and the people.
We have opened the new relation with the Soviet Union. We
must continue to develop and expand that new relationship so that the two strongest
nations of the world will live together in cooperation rather than confrontation.
Around the world, in Asia, in Africa, in Latin America,
in the Middle East, there are millions of people who live in terrible poverty, even
starvation. We must keep as our goal turning away from production for war and expanding
production for peace so that people everywhere on this earth can at last look forward in
their children's time, if not in our own time, to having the necessities for a decent
Here in America, we are fortunate that most of our people
have not only the blessings of liberty but also the means to live full and good and, by
the world's standards, even abundant lives. We must press on, however, toward a goal of
not only more and better jobs but of full opportunity for every American and of what we
are striving so hard right now to achieve, prosperity without inflation.
For more than a quarter of a century in public life I
have shared in the turbulent history of this era. I have fought for what I believed in. I
have tried to the best of my ability to discharge those duties and meet those
responsibilities that were entrusted to me.
Sometimes I have succeeded and sometimes I have failed,
but always I have taken heart from what Theodore Roosevelt once said about the man in the
arena, "whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who
errs and comes short again and again because there is not effort without error and
shortcoming, but who does actually strive to do the deed, who knows the great enthusiasms,
the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause, who at the best knows in the
end the triumphs of high achievements and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails
while daring greatly."
I pledge to you tonight that as long as I have a breath
of life in my body, I shall continue in that spirit. I shall continue to work for the
great causes to which I have been dedicated throughout my years as a Congressman, a
Senator, a Vice President, and President, the cause of peace not just for America but
among all nations, prosperity, justice, and opportunity for all of our people.
There is one cause above all to which I have been devoted
and to which I shall always be devoted for as long as I live.
When I first took the oath of office as President 5 1/2
years ago, I made this sacred commitment, to "consecrate my office, my energies, and
all the wisdom I can summon to the cause of peace among nations."
I have done my very best in all the days since to be true
to that pledge. As a result of these efforts, I am confident that the world is a safer
place today, not only for the people of America but for the people of all nations, and
that all of our children have a better chance than before of living in peace rather than
dying in war.
This, more than anything, is what I hoped to achieve when
I sought the Presidency. This, more than anything, is what I hope will be my legacy to
you, to our country, as I leave the Presidency.
To have served in this office is to have felt a very
personal sense of kinship with each and every American. In leaving it, I do so with this
prayer: May God's grace be with you in all the days ahead.
Clinton's Remarks to
Vietnam National University
was the first US President to visit Vietnam since President Nixon's wartime visit in July
On 17 November
2000, President Clinton made the following remarks during a speech to students at Vietnam
National University in Hanoi.
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much, and good
afternoon. I can think of no more fitting place to begin my visit at this hopeful moment
in our common history than here at Hanoi National University.
I was given a Vietnamese phrase; I am going to try to say it. If I mess it up, feel free
to laugh at me. Xin chao cac ban.(a)
(a) Hello, everybody.
So much of the promise of this youthful nation is
embodied with you. I learned that you have exchanges here with students from nearly 100
universities, from Canada to France to Korea -- and that you are now hosting more than a
dozen full-time students from your partner school in the United States, the University of
I salute your vigorous efforts to engage the
world. Of course,
like students everywhere, I know you have things to think about other than your studies.
For example, in September, you had to study for your classes and watch the Olympic
accomplishments of Tran Hieu Ngan in Sydney. And this week you have to study and cheer Le
Huynh Duc and Nguyen Hong Son in Bangkok at the football matches. (Applause.)
I am honored to be the first American President
to see Hanoi,
and to visit this university. But I do so conscious that the
histories of our two nations are deeply intertwined in ways that are both a source of pain
for generations that came before, and a source of promise for generations yet to come.
Two centuries ago, during the early days of the
United States, we reached across the seas for partners in trade and one of the first
nations we encountered was Vietnam. In fact, one of our founding fathers, Thomas
Jefferson, tried to obtain rice seed from Vietnam to grow on his farm in Virginia 200
years ago. By the time World War II arrived, the United States had become a significant
consumer of export from Vietnam. In 1945, at the moment of your country's birth, the words
of Thomas Jefferson were chosen to be echoed in your own Declaration of Independence:
"All men are created equal. The Creator has given us certain inviolable rights -- the
right to life, the right to be free, the right to achieve happiness."
Of course, all of this common history, 200 years
of it, has been obscured in the last few decades by the conflict we call the Vietnam War
and you call the American War. You may know that in Washington, D.C., on our National
Mall, there is a stark black granite wall engraved with the name of every single American
who died in Vietnam.
At this solemn memorial, some American veterans also refer to the "other side of the
wall," the staggering sacrifice of the Vietnamese people on both sides of that
conflict -- more than three million brave soldiers and civilians.
This shared suffering has given our countries a
unlike any other. Because of the conflict, America is now home to one million Americans of
Vietnamese ancestry. Because of the conflict, three million Americans veterans served in
Vietnam, as did many journalists, embassy personnel, aid workers and others who are
forever connected to your country.
Almost 20 years ago now, a group of American
servicemen took the first step to reestablish contacts between the United States and
Vietnam. They traveled back to Vietnam for the first time since the war, and as they
walked through the streets of Hanoi, they were approached by Vietnamese citizens who had
heard of their visit: Are you the American soldiers, they asked? Not sure what to expect,
our veterans answered, yes, we are. And to their immense relief, their hosts simply said,
welcome to Vietnam.
More veterans followed, including distinguished
veterans and heroes who serve now in the United States Congress: Senator John McCain,
Senator Bob Kerrey, Senator Chuck Robb, and Senator John Kerry from Massachusetts, who is
here with me today, along with a number of representatives from our Congress, some of whom
are veterans of the Vietnam conflict.
When they came here, they were determined to
honor those who fought without refighting the battles; to remember our history, but not to
perpetuate it; to give young people like you in both our countries the chance to live in
your tomorrows, not in our yesterdays. As Ambassador Pete Peterson has said so
eloquently, "We cannot change the past. What we can change is the future."
Our new relationship gained strength as American
launched nonprofit organizations to work on behalf of the Vietnamese people, such as
providing devices to people with war injuries to help them lead more normal lives.
Vietnam's willingness to help us return the remains of our fallen servicemen to their
families has been the biggest boost to improve ties. And there are many Americans here who
have worked in that endeavor for many years now, including our Secretary of Veterans
Affairs, Hershel Gober.
The desire to be reunited with a lost family
member is something we all understand. It touches the hearts of Americans to know that
every Sunday in Vietnam one of your most-watched television shows features families
seeking viewers' help in finding loved ones they lost in the war so long ago now. And we
are grateful for the Vietnamese villagers who have helped us to find our missing and,
therefore, to give their families the peace of mind that comes with knowing what actually
happened to their loved ones.
No two nations have ever before done the things
we are doing together to find the missing from the Vietnam conflict. Teams of Americans
and Vietnamese work together, sometimes in tight and dangerous places. The Vietnamese
government has offered us access to files and government information to assist our search.
And, in turn, we have been able to give Vietnam almost 400,000 pages of documents that
could assist in your search. On this trip, I have brought with me another 350,000 pages of
documents that I hope will help Vietnamese families find out what happened to their
missing loved ones.
Today, I was honored to present these to your
President, Tran Duc Luong. And I told him before the year is over, America will provide
another million pages of documents. We will continue to offer our help and to ask for your
help as we both honor our commitment to do whatever we can for as long as it takes to
achieve the fullest possible accounting of our loved ones.
Your cooperation in that mission over these last
eight years has made it possible for America to support international lending to Vietnam,
to resume trade between our countries, to establish formal diplomatic relations and, this
year, to sign a pivotal trade agreement.
Finally, America is coming to see Vietnam as your
people have asked for years -- as a country, not a war. A country with the highest
literacy rate in Southeast Asia; a country whose young people just won three Gold Medals
at the International Math Olympiad in Seoul; a country of gifted, hardworking
entrepreneurs emerging from years of conflict and uncertainty to shape a bright future.
Today, the United States and Vietnam open a new
chapter in our relationship, at a time when people all across the world trade more, travel
more, know more about and talk more with each other than ever before. Even as people take
pride in their national independence, we know we are becoming more and more
interdependent. The movement of people, money and ideas across borders, frankly, breeds
suspicion among many good people in every country. They are worried about globalization
because of its unsettling and unpredictable consequences.
Yet, globalization is not something we can hold
off or turn off. It is the economic equivalent of a force of nature -- like wind or water.
We can harness wind to fill a sail. We can use water to generate energy. We can work hard
to protect people and property from storms and floods. But there is no point in denying
the existence of wind or water, or trying to make them go away. The same is true for
globalization. We can work to maximize its benefits and minimize its risks, but we cannot
ignore it -- and it is not going away.
In the last decade, as the volume of world trade
investment flows from wealthy nations to developing ones have increased by six times, from
$25 billion in 1990 to more than $150 billion in 1998. Nations that have opened their
economies to the international trading system have grown at least twice as fast as nations
with closed economies. Your next job may well depend on foreign trade and investment. Come
to think of it, since I have to leave office in about eight weeks, my next job may depend
on foreign trade and investment.
Over the last 15 years, Vietnam launched its
policy of Doi Moi, joined APEC and ASEAN, normalized relations with the European Union and
the United States, and disbanded collective farming, freeing farmers to grow what they
want and earn the fruits of their own labor. The results were impressive proof of the
power of your markets and the abilities of your people. You not only conquered
malnutrition, you became the world's second largest exporter of rice and achieved stronger
overall economic growth.
Of course, in recent years the rate of growth has
foreign investment has declined here, showing that any attempt to remain isolated from the
risks of a global economy also guarantees isolation from its rewards, as well.
General Secretary Le Kha Phieu said this summer,
and I quote, "We have yet to achieve the level of development commensurate with the
possibilities of our country. And there is only one way to further open up the
economy." So this summer, in what I believe will be seen as a pivotal step toward
your future prosperity, Vietnam joined the United States in signing an historic bilateral
trade agreement, building a foundation for Vietnam's entry eventually into the World Trade
Under the agreement, Vietnam will grant to its
over time to citizens of other countries, rights to import, export and distribute goods,
giving the Vietnamese people expanding rights to determine their own economic destiny.
Vietnam has agreed it will subject important decisions to the rule of law and the
international trading system, increase the flow of information to its people, and
accelerate the rise of a free economy and the private sector.
Of course, this will be good for Vietnam's
like the United States. But it will be even better for Vietnam's own entrepreneurs, who
are working hard to build businesses of their own. Under this agreement, Vietnam could be
earning, according to the World Bank, another $1.5 billion each and every year from
Both our nations were born with a Declaration of
Independence. This trade agreement is a form of declaration of interdependence, a clear,
unequivocal statement that prosperity in the 21st century depends upon a nation's economic
engagement in the rest of the world.
This new openness is a great opportunity for you.
But it does not guarantee success. What else should be done? Vietnam is such a young
country, with 60 percent of your population under the age of 30, and 1.4 million new
people entering your work force every year.
Your leaders realize that government and state-owned businesses cannot generate 1.4
million new jobs every year. They know that the industries driving the global economy
today -- computers, telecommunications, biotechnology -- these are all based on knowledge.
That is why economies all over the world grow faster when young people stay in school
longer, when women have the same educational opportunities that men have, when young
people like you have every opportunity to explore new ideas and then to turn those ideas
into your own business opportunities.
You can be -- indeed, those of you in this hall
today must be -- the engine of Vietnam's future prosperity. As President Tran Duc Luong
has said, the internal strength of the country is the intellect and capacity of its
The United States has great respect for your
capacity. One of our government's largest educational exchange programs is with Vietnam.
And we want to do more. Senator Kerry is right there, and I mentioned him earlier -- is
leading an effort in our United States Congress, along with Senator John McCain and other
veterans of the conflict here, to establish a new Vietnam Education Foundation. Once
enacted, the foundation would support 100 fellowships every year, either here or in the
United States, for people to study or teach science, math, technology and medicine.
We're ready to put more funding in our exchange
programs now so this effort can get underway immediately. I hope some of you in this room
will have a chance to take part. And I want to thank Senator Kerry for this great idea.
Thank you, sir, for what you have done. (Applause.)
Let me say, as important as knowledge is, the
knowledge are necessarily limited by undue restrictions on its use.
We Americans believe the freedom to explore, to travel, to think, to speak, to shape
decisions that affect our lives enrich the lives of individuals and nations in ways that
go far beyond economics.
Now, America's record is not perfect in this
area. After all,
it took us almost a century to banish slavery. It took us even
longer to give women the right to vote. And we are still seeking to live up to the more
perfect union of our founders' dreams and the words of our Declaration of Independence and
Constitution. But along the way over these 226 years -- 224 years -- we've learned some
lessons. For example, we have seen that economies work better where newspapers are free to
expose corruption, and independent courts can ensure that contracts are honored, that
competition is robust and fair, that public officials honor the rule of law.
In our experience, guaranteeing the right to
and the right to political dissent does not threaten the stability of a society. Instead,
it builds people's confidence in the fairness of our institutions, and enables us to take
it when a decision goes in a way we don't agree with. All this makes our country stronger
in good times and bad. In our experience, young people are much more likely to have
confidence in their future if they have a say in shaping it, in choosing their
governmental leaders and having a government that is accountable to those it serves.
Now, let me say emphatically, we do not seek to
impose these ideals, nor could we. Vietnam is an ancient and enduring country. You have
proved to the world that you will make your own decisions. Only you can decide, for
example, if you will continue to share Vietnam's talents and ideas with the world; if you
will continue to open Vietnam so that you can enrich it with the insights of others.
Only you can decide if you will continue to open your markets, open your society and
strengthen the rule of law. Only you can decide how to weave individual liberties and
human rights into the rich and strong fabric of Vietnamese national identity.
Your future should be in your hands, the hands of
the Vietnam people. But your future is important to the rest of us, as well. For as
Vietnam succeeds, it will benefit this region and your trading partners and your friends
throughout the world.
We are eager to increase our cooperation with you
across the board. We want to continue our work to clear land mines and unexploded
ordnance. We want to strengthen our common efforts to protect the environment by phasing
out leaded gasoline in Vietnam, maintaining a clean water supply, saving coral reefs and
tropical forests. We want to bolster our efforts on disaster relief and prevention,
including our efforts to help those suffering from the floods in the Mekong Delta.
Yesterday, we presented to your government satellite imagery from our Global Disaster
Information Network -- images that show in great detail the latest flood levels
on the Delta that can help Vietnam to rebuild.
We want to accelerate our cooperation in science,
cooperation focused this month on our meeting in Singapore to study together the health
and ecological effects of dioxin on the people of Vietnam and the Americans who were in
Vietnam; and cooperation that we are advancing further with the Science and Technology
Agreement our two countries signed just today.
We want to be your ally in the fight against
like AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. I am glad to announce that we will nearly double our
support of Vietnam's efforts to contain the AIDS crisis through education, prevention,
care and treatment. We want to work with you to make Vietnam a safer place by giving you
help to reduce preventable injuries -- on the streets, at home and in the workplace. We
want to work with you to make the most of this trade agreement, by providing technical
assistance to assure its full and smooth implementation, in finding ways to encourage
greater United States investment in your country.
We are, in short, eager to build our partnership
We believe it's good for both our nations. We believe the Vietnamese people have the
talent to succeed in this new global age as they have in the past.
We know it because we've seen the progress you
have made in this last decade. We have seen the talent and ingenuity of the Vietnamese who
have come to settle in America. Vietnamese-Americans have become elected officials,
judges, leaders in science and in our high-tech industry. Last year, a Vietnamese-American
achieved a mathematical breakthrough that will make it easier to conduct high-quality
video-conferencing. And all America took notice when Hoang Nhu Tran graduated number one
in his class at the United States Air Force Academy.
Vietnamese-Americans have flourished not just
because of their unique abilities and their good values, but also because they have had
the opportunity to make the most of their abilities and their values. As your
opportunities grow to live, to learn, to express your creativity, there will be no
stopping the people of Vietnam.
And you will find, I am certain, that the American people will be by your side. For in
this interdependent world, we truly do have a stake in your success.
Almost 200 years ago, at the beginning of the
relations between the United States and Vietnam, our two nations made many attempts to
negotiate a treaty of commerce, sort of like the trade agreement that we signed today. But
200 years ago, they all failed, and no treaty was concluded. Listen to what one historian
said about what happened 200 years ago, and think how many times it could have been said
in the two centuries since. He said, "These efforts failed because two distant
cultures were talking past each other, and the importance of each to the other was
insufficient to overcome these barriers."
Let the days when we talk past each other be gone
for good. Let us acknowledge our importance to one another. Let us continue to help each
other heal the wounds of war, not by forgetting the bravery shown and the tragedy suffered
by all sides, but by embracing the spirit of reconciliation and the courage to build
better tomorrows for our children.
May our children learn from us that good people,
respectful dialogue, can discover and rediscover their common humanity, and that a
painful, painful past can be redeemed in a peaceful and prosperous future.
Thank you for welcoming me and my family and our
American delegation to Vietnam. Thank you for your faith in the future. Chuc cac ban suc
khoe va thanh cong.(b)
(b) May you have health and success.
Thank you very much.
Hits since November 20, 2001